A novel microfluidic microelectrode chip for a significantly enhanced monitoring of NPY-receptor activation in live mode.

Lab-on-a-chip devices that combine, e.g. chemical synthesis with integrated on-chip analytics and multi-compartment organ-on-a-chip approaches, are a fast and attractive evolving research area. While integration of appropriate cell models in microfluidic setups for monitoring the biological activity of synthesis products or test compounds is already in focus, the integration of label-free bioelectronic analysis techniques is still poorly realized. In this context, we investigated the capabilities of impedance spectroscopy as a non-destructive real-time monitoring technique for adherent cell models in a microfluidic setup. While an initial adaptation of a microelectrode array (MEA) layout from a static setup revealed clear restrictions in the application of impedance spectroscopy in a microfluidic chip, we could demonstrate the advantage of a FEM simulation based rational MEA layout optimization for an optimum electrical field distribution within microfluidic structures. Furthermore, FEM simulation based analysis of shear stress and time-dependent test compound distribution led to identification of an optimal flow rate. Based on the simulation derived optimized microfluidic MEA, comparable impedance spectra characteristics were achieved for HEK293A cells cultured under microfluidic and static conditions. Furthermore, HEK293A cells expressing Y1 receptors were used to successfully demonstrate the capabilities of impedimetric monitoring of cellular alterations in the microfluidic setup. More strikingly, the maximum impedimetric signal for the receptor activation was significantly increased by a factor of 2.8. Detailed investigations of cell morphology and motility led to the conclusion that cultivation under microfluidic conditions could lead to an extended and stabilized cell-electrode interface.

[1]  E. Sevick-Muraca,et al.  Fluid shear stress activates YAP1 to promote cancer cell motility , 2017, Nature Communications.

[2]  T-A Meier,et al.  On-chip monitoring of chemical syntheses in microdroplets via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. , 2015, Chemical communications.

[3]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  Shear stress–induced endothelial cell polarization is mediated by Rho and Rac but not Cdc42 or PI 3-kinases , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  M. Schaefer,et al.  Towards an integrated device that utilizes adherent cells in a micro-free-flow electrophoresis chip to achieve separation and biosensing , 2013, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[5]  L E Erickson,et al.  A review of the effects of shear and interfacial phenomena on cell viability. , 1993, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[6]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Hydrodynamic Damage to Animal Cells , 2001, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[7]  Maryam Tabrizian,et al.  Dielectric spectroscopy as a viable biosensing tool for cell and tissue characterization and analysis. , 2013, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[8]  A. Beck‐Sickinger,et al.  Microelectrode chip based real time monitoring of vital MCF-7 mamma carcinoma cells by impedance spectroscopy. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[9]  Gang Bao,et al.  Tumour-on-a-chip: microfluidic models of tumour morphology, growth and microenvironment , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  N. Jeon,et al.  Hybrid polymer microfluidic platform to mimic varying vascular compliance and topology. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Aldo G. M. Brinkman,et al.  A generic microfluidic biosensor of G protein-coupled receptor activation – impedance measurements of reversible morphological changes of reverse transfected HEK293 cells on microelectrodes , 2015 .

[12]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. , 2015, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[13]  Chip‐based electrochromatography coupled to ESI‐MS detection , 2016, Electrophoresis.

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Da-Jeng Yao,et al.  Get to Understand More from Single-Cells: Current Studies of Microfluidic-Based Techniques for Single-Cell Analysis , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[16]  Clay W Scott,et al.  Label-free whole-cell assays: expanding the scope of GPCR screening. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[17]  Matsuhiko Nishizawa,et al.  Monitoring impedance changes associated with motility and mitosis of a single cell. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[18]  L. Mir,et al.  Changes of cell electrical parameters induced by electroporation. A dielectrophoresis study. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  Richard Bruch,et al.  Multiplexed Point-of-Care Testing – xPOCT , 2017, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  A. Barakat,et al.  Effect of shear stress on migration and integrin expression in macaque trophoblast cells. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  Sabine Schmidt,et al.  A cell-based impedance assay for monitoring transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channel activity. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[22]  Joel Voldman,et al.  nDEP microwells for single-cell patterning in physiological media. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[23]  Simone Bersini,et al.  Bioprinting and Organ-on-Chip Applications Towards Personalized Medicine for Bone Diseases , 2017, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[24]  Marc Peschanski,et al.  Impedimetric real-time monitoring of neural pluripotent stem cell differentiation process on microelectrode arrays. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[25]  R. J. Beulig,et al.  A droplet-chip/mass spectrometry approach to study organic synthesis at nanoliter scale. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[26]  Yong Duan,et al.  A review of impedance measurements of whole cells. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[27]  S. Ohla,et al.  On-chip integration of organic synthesis and HPLC/MS analysis for monitoring stereoselective transformations at the micro-scale. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Accessing new chemical entities through microfluidic systems. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  D. Belder,et al.  Multistep liquid-phase lithography for fast prototyping of microfluidic free-flow-electrophoresis chips , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[30]  Yung-Shin Sun Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies , 2016, Molecules.

[31]  A. P. Mazzoleni,et al.  Conductivity values of tissue culture medium from 20°C to 40°C , 1986 .

[32]  M. Schaefer,et al.  Quantitative characterization of capsaicin-induced TRPV1 ion channel activation in HEK293 cells by impedance spectroscopy , 2016, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[33]  D. Belder,et al.  Enantioselective reaction monitoring utilizing two-dimensional heart-cut liquid chromatography on an integrated microfluidic chip. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[34]  Joong Yull Park,et al.  Responses of human adipose-derived stem cells to interstitial level of extremely low shear flows regarding differentiation, morphology, and proliferation. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[35]  A. Robitzki,et al.  An impedimetric microelectrode-based array sensor for label-free detection of tau hyperphosphorylation in human cells. , 2009, Lab on a chip.