A Classification Method for User-Independent Intent Recognition for Transfemoral Amputees Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses

Powered lower limb prosthesis technologies hold the promise of providing greater ability and mobility to transfemoral amputees. Intent recognition systems for these devices may allow amputees to perform automatic, seamless transitions between locomotion modes. Prior studies in which pattern recognition algorithms have been trained to recognize subject-specific patterns within device-mounted sensor data have shown the feasibility of such systems. While effective, these strategies require substantial training regimens. To reduce this training burden, we developed and evaluated user-independent intent recognition systems. A novel mode-specific classification system was developed that allowed each locomotion transition to be statistically considered its own class. Various pattern recognition algorithms were trained with sensor data from a pool of eight lower limb amputees and performance was tested using data on a novel subject. For both user-dependent and user-independent classification, mode-specific classification reduced error ( ) on transitional steps by ~ 50% without affecting steady-state classification. Incorporating sensor time history and level-ground walking data from the novel subject into the training data resulted in decreasing errors ( ) on steady-state classification by over 60% without affecting transitional error. These strategies were combined to demonstrate significant overall system improvements from baseline conditions presented in prior research.

[1]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Design and control of an active electrical knee and ankle prosthesis , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[2]  Ari Wilkenfeld,et al.  Biologically inspired autoadaptive control of a knee prosthesis , 2000 .

[3]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Samuel Kwok Wai Au,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis for the improvement of amputee walking economy , 2007 .

[5]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Accelerometry based classification of gait patterns using empirical mode decomposition , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[6]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Limb Amputation and Limb Deficiency: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in the United States , 2002, Southern medical journal.

[7]  Liam Kilmartin,et al.  Optimising recognition rates for subject independent gait pattern classification , 2009 .

[8]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Thomas Schmalz,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of stair ambulation in lower limb amputees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[11]  Liam Kilmartin,et al.  Gait patterns classification using spectral features , 2008 .

[12]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[13]  M. Nash,et al.  The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration , 2010 .

[16]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Control of Stair Ascent and Descent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  A method to determine the optimal features for control of a powered lower-limb prostheses , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[19]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[20]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Classifying the intent of novel users during human locomotion using powered lower limb prostheses , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[21]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  D. Datta,et al.  Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A Training Method for Locomotion Mode Prediction Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Preliminary design of a terrain recognition system , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Intent Recognition in a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Time History Information , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.