Bottom-up learning of feedback in a categorization task

We designed a laboratory study to investigate the influence of social interaction on category learning. The objective in the present study is to examine what kind of teaching behavior can improve an agent's learning of categories. In a computer-based study participants learned four categories for sixteen objects which appear on a computer screen. The objects' categories determine what kind of manipulation is to be done on the objects. Five tutors and twenty participants were recruited to participate. For the study the tutors were placed in front of a computer in one room whereas the learners were in another room. The learners' task was to manipulate the objects appropriately through the instructions they received from the tutor on their screens via six symbols. These six symbols were the only way for the tutor to communicate with the learner. We call this a bottom-up learning as the it relies entirely on the perception of the tutors' symbols without any prior knowledge of their meaning. The focus in the present study is not on the ability by the learner to acquire knowledge of the categories but on the types of instructions that the tutor gave during the trials and the effects of the feedback given to the learner. Therefore, the feedback given by the tutors via the symbols was classified and quantified.

[1]  S. Nolfi,et al.  Developing the Ability to Manipulate Objects : A Comparative Study with Human and Artificial Agents , 2010 .

[2]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Tutor Spotter: Proposing a Feature Set and Evaluating It in a Robotic System , 2011, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[4]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Emergence of Embodied Communication in Artificial Agents and Humans , 2008 .

[6]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[7]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  S. Gelman Learning from others: children's construction of concepts. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  Joint Action: Current Perspectives , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[11]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  The Adaptive Advantage of Symbolic Theft Over Sensorimotor Toil: Grounding Language in Perceptual Categories , 2001 .

[12]  S. Gelman,et al.  Child categorization. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[13]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  II. The Emergentist Coalition Model , 2000 .

[14]  Katharina J. Rohlfing,et al.  Developing feedback: How children of different age contribute to a tutoring interaction with adults , 2010, 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[15]  Rebecca J. Brand,et al.  Breaking the language barrier: an emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. , 2000, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[16]  Katharina J. Rohlfing,et al.  How can multimodal cues from child-directed interaction reduce learning complexity in robots? , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[17]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.