Children's social goals and self-efficacy perceptions as influences on their responses to ambiguous provocation.

This study examined whether children who vary in their behavioral responses (aggression vs. withdrawal vs. problem solving) to ambiguous provocation but who are similar in their attributional processes differ in their social goals and self-efficacy perceptions. In response to 10 hypothetical situations involving ambiguous provocation, fourth- and fifth-grade students (n = 781) indicated whether or not the protagonist intended to cause the harm and reported how they would respond to the protagonist's action. Newly developed measures assessed children's situated social goals and self-efficacy perceptions. Results indicated that the aggressive, withdrawn, and problem-solving responders differed in their social goals and self-efficacy perceptions. The strength of the findings, compared to earlier work on children's goals and self-efficacy perceptions, suggests the importance of a situated social-cognitive assessment in which children's thoughts are measured in a specific kind of social situation and are related to their reported behavior in the same type of situation.

[1]  G. Ladd,et al.  Children's perceptions of the outcomes of social strategies : do the ends justify being mean? , 1990 .

[2]  C. Dweck,et al.  Relations among children's social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[3]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Conflict and the development of antisocial behavior. , 1992 .

[4]  S. Asher,et al.  Children's goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. , 1996 .

[5]  K. Wentzel,et al.  Strategies for Making Friends: Relations to Social Behavior and Peer Acceptance in Early Adolescence. , 1993 .

[6]  Peter Renshaw,et al.  Children's goals and strategies for social interaction. , 1983 .

[7]  K. Dodge,et al.  Peer group behavior and social status. , 1990 .

[8]  Nancy G. Guerra,et al.  Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: I. Assessment. , 1988 .

[9]  S. Graham,et al.  Attributional and emotional determinants of aggression among African-American and Latino young adolescents. , 1992 .

[10]  K. Dodge,et al.  The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: implications for developmental psychopathology. , 1984, Child development.

[11]  S. Asher,et al.  Peer Assessment of the Behavioral Characteristics of Poorly Accepted Boys and Girls. , 1992 .

[12]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior. , 1980, Child development.

[13]  G. Ladd,et al.  Assessment of children's self-efficacy for social interactions with peers , 1982 .

[14]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. , 1982, Child development.

[15]  K. Dodge,et al.  A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. , 1994 .

[16]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility. , 1980, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  John M. Gottman,et al.  An Interactional Model of Children's Entry into Peer Groups , 1981 .

[18]  J. Lochman,et al.  Social goals: Relationship to adolescent adjustment and to social problem solving , 1993, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[19]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[20]  C S Dweck,et al.  Learned helplessness in social situations. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. , 1986, Child development.

[22]  D W Shantz,et al.  Conflict, aggression, and peer status: an observational study. , 1986, Child development.