Statistical analyses of the results of 25 years of beach litter surveys on the south-eastern North Sea coast.

In the North Sea, the amount of litter present in the marine environment represents a severe environmental problem. In order to assess the magnitude of the problem and measure changes in abundance, the results of two beach litter monitoring programmes were compared and analysed for long-term trends applying multivariate techniques. Total beach litter pollution was persistently high. Spatial differences in litter abundance made it difficult to identify long-term trends: Partly more than 8000 litter items year(-1) were recorded on a 100 m long survey site on the island of Scharhörn, while the survey site on the beach on the island of Amrum revealed abundances lower by two orders of magnitude. Beach litter was dominated by plastic with mean proportions of 52%-91% of total beach litter. Non-parametric time series analyses detected many significant trends, which, however, did not show any systematic spatial patterns. Cluster analyses partly led to groupings of beaches according to their expositions to sources of litter, wind and currents. Surveys in short intervals of one to two weeks were found to give higher annual sums of beach litter than the quarterly surveys of the OSPAR method. Surveys at regular intervals of four weeks to five months would make monitoring results more reliable.

[1]  Emily E. Peacock,et al.  Plastic Accumulation in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre , 2010, Science.

[2]  P. Randerson,et al.  Beach Litter Sourcing in the Bristol Channel and Wales, U.K. , 2003 .

[3]  D. Barnes,et al.  Rafting by five phyla on man-made flotsam in the Southern Ocean , 2003 .

[4]  C. Ribic,et al.  Trends and drivers of marine debris on the Atlantic coast of the United States 1997-2007. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[5]  G. Vauk,et al.  Litter pollution from ships in the German Bight , 1987 .

[6]  Jiasong Fang,et al.  Use of indicator chemicals to characterize the plastic fragments ingested by Laysan albatross. , 2014, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  J. Luque,et al.  Marine debris ingestion by Magellanic penguins, Spheniscus magellanicus (Aves: Sphenisciformes), from the Brazilian coastal zone. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[8]  C. Ribic,et al.  Trends in marine debris along the U.S. Pacific Coast and Hawai'i 1998-2007. , 2012, Marine pollution bulletin.

[9]  M. Matthies,et al.  Marine litter ensemble transport simulations in the southern North Sea. , 2014, Marine pollution bulletin.

[10]  D. Barnes,et al.  Biodiversity: Invasions by marine life on plastic debris , 2002, Nature.

[11]  W. J. Nichols,et al.  Global research priorities to mitigate plastic pollution impacts on marine wildlife , 2014 .

[12]  Martin Schulz,et al.  Daily accumulation rates of marine debris on sub-Antarctic island beaches. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  M. Costa,et al.  Marine debris review for Latin America and the wider Caribbean region: from the 1970s until now, and where do we go from here? , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[14]  D. Barnes,et al.  Drifting plastic and its consequences for sessile organism dispersal in the Atlantic Ocean , 2005 .

[15]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[16]  M. Matthies,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation system for marine litter pollution based on statistical analyses of OSPAR beach litter monitoring time series. , 2013, Marine environmental research.

[17]  M. Kendall,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[18]  S. Votier,et al.  The use of plastic debris as nesting material by a colonial seabird and associated entanglement mortality. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[19]  Julia Reisser,et al.  Plastic Pollution in the World's Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  W. Widmer,et al.  Marine Debris in the Island of Santa Catarina, South Brazil: Spatial Patterns, Composition, and Biological Aspects , 2010 .

[21]  P. Randerson,et al.  The use of multivariate statistical techniques to establish beach debris pollution sources , 2002, Journal of Coastal Research.

[22]  Peter G Ryan,et al.  The effect of fine-scale sampling frequency on estimates of beach litter accumulation. , 2014, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  H. B. Mann.  Nonparametric Tests Against Trend , 1945 .

[25]  C. Ribic,et al.  Trends in Marine Debris in the U.S. Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico 1996-2003 , 2011 .

[26]  J. A. van Franeker,et al.  Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[27]  A. Turra,et al.  Plastic pellets as oviposition site and means of dispersal for the ocean-skater insect Halobates. , 2012, Marine pollution bulletin.

[28]  M. Gregory.  Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings—entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  T. Sørensen,et al.  A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons , 1948 .

[30]  M. Matthies,et al.  Comparative analysis of time series of marine litter surveyed on beaches and the seafloor in the southeastern North Sea. , 2015, Marine environmental research.

[31]  M. Biesinger,et al.  Plastics and beaches: a degrading relationship. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[32]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L). , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Other,et al.  Marine litter in the Northeast Atlantic Region: assessment and priorities for response , 2009 .