Close-up images of the final Philae landing site on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko acquired by the ROLIS camera

After coming to rest on the night side of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, the ROLIS camera on-board Rosetta’s Philae lander acquired five images of the surface below the lander, four of which were with the aid of LED illumination of different colors. The images confirm that Philae was perched on a sloped surface. A local horizon is visible in one corner of the image, beyond which we can see the coma. Having spent a full day on the surface Philae was commanded to lift and rotate, after which a final, sixth, LED image was acquired. The change in perspective allowed us to construct a shape model of the surface. The distance to the foreground was about 80 cm, much larger than the nominal 30 cm. This caused stray light, rather than directly reflected LED light, to dominate the image signal, complicating the analysis. The images show a lumpy surface with a roughness of apparently fractal nature. Its appearance is completely different from that of the first landing site, which was characterized by centimeter to meter-sized debris (Mottola et al., 2015). We recognize neither particles nor pores at the image resolution of 0.8 mm per pixel and large color variations are absent. The surface has a bi-modal brightness distribution that can be interpreted in terms of the degree of consolidation, a hypothesis that we support with experimental evidence. We propose the surface below the lander to consist of smooth, cracked plates with unconsolidated edges, similar to terrain seen in CIVA images.

[1]  N. Thomas,et al.  Sublimation of water ice mixed with silicates and tholins: Evolution of surface texture and reflectance spectra, with implications for comets , 2016 .

[2]  F. Scholten,et al.  The landing(s) of Philae and inferences about comet surface mechanical properties , 2015, Science.

[3]  M. Banaszkiewicz,et al.  Thermal and mechanical properties of the near-surface layers of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[4]  S. Debei,et al.  Fractures on comet 67P/Churyumov‐Gerasimenko observed by Rosetta/OSIRIS , 2015 .

[5]  Dust release and tensile strength of the non-volatile layer of cometary nuclei , 2011, 1111.0768.

[6]  C. Pilorget,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko surface properties as derived from CIVA panoramic images , 2015, Science.

[7]  M. Banaszkiewicz,et al.  Mupus – A Thermal and Mechanical Properties Probe for the Rosetta Lander Philae , 2007 .

[8]  C. Pilorget,et al.  Origin of the local structures at the Philae landing site and possible implications on the formation and evolution of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko , 2016 .

[9]  H. Keller,et al.  What drives the dust activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko? , 2015, 1506.08545.

[10]  William D. Smythe,et al.  The Opposition Effect of the Moon: Coherent BackscatterandShadow Hiding , 1998 .

[11]  U. Fink,et al.  The organic-rich surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by VIRTIS/Rosetta , 2015, Science.

[12]  S. Erard,et al.  Refractory and semi-volatile organics at the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Insights from the VIRTIS/Rosetta imaging spectrometer , 2016 .

[13]  S. Debei,et al.  Insolation, erosion, and morphology of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015 .

[15]  F. Scholten,et al.  The structure of the regolith on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from ROLIS descent imaging , 2015, Science.

[16]  R. Jaumann,et al.  The Rolis Experiment on the Rosetta Lander , 2007 .

[17]  S. Debei,et al.  Characterization of the Abydos region through OSIRIS high-resolution images in support of CIVA measurements , 2016 .

[18]  S. Debei,et al.  Rotating dust particles in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015 .

[19]  S. Debei,et al.  REDISTRIBUTION OF PARTICLES ACROSS THE NUCLEUS OF COMET 67P/CHURYUMOV-GERASIMENKO , 2015 .