The dynamics of negative concord

Concord describes a natural language phenomenon in which a single logical meaning is expressed syntactically on multiple lexical items. The canonical example is negative concord, in which multiple negative expressions are used, but a single negation is interpreted. Formally similar phenomena have been observed for the redundant marking of distributivity and definiteness. Inspired by recent dynamic analyses of these latter two phenomena, we extend a similar dynamic analysis to negative concord. We propose that negative concord items introduce a discourse referent (like an existential), but then test that no discourse referent has been introduced in any assignment. These apparently contradictory requirements are licensed with split scope around negation: introduction occurs below negation; the test appears above it. The analysis successfully predicts that negative concord items must be licensed by a sufficiently local negative operator. We further show that modulation of what is at-issue can account for cases in which NC items themselves carry negative force.

[1]  Simon Charlow,et al.  Where is the destructive update problem? , 2019, Semantics and Pragmatics.

[2]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Negative ... Concord? , 2000 .

[3]  A. Kratzer,et al.  Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese , 2017 .

[4]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[5]  Frans Zwarts,et al.  A Semantic Analysis of Negative Concord , 1993 .

[6]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Modal indefinites , 2010 .

[7]  K. Fintel,et al.  Exceptive constructions , 1993 .

[8]  M. Espinal,et al.  Double Negation in Catalan and Spanish. Interaction Between Syntax and Prosody , 2016 .

[9]  Robert May,et al.  Interpreting logical form , 1989 .

[10]  I. Laka Negation in syntax--on the nature of functional categories and projections , 1990 .

[11]  Chris Barker,et al.  Continuations and Natural Language , 2014, Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics.

[12]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity , 2008 .

[13]  Raffaella Zanuttini,et al.  Syntactic properties of sentential negation : a comparative study of Romance languages , 1991 .

[14]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention , 2013 .

[15]  Anna Szabolcsi Strict and Non-strict Negative Concord in Hungarian: A Unified Analysis , 2018 .

[16]  M. Espinal On the semantic status of n-words in Catalan and Spanish , 2000 .

[17]  Paul Dekker,et al.  Transsentential meditations : ups and downs in dynamic semantics , 1993 .

[18]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Local Contexts , 2008 .

[19]  Nicholas J. Haddock,et al.  Incremental Interpretation and Combinatory Categorial Grammar , 1987, IJCAI.

[20]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  DRT with local contexts , 2011 .

[21]  Susanne Wurmbrand The cost of raising quantifiers , 2018 .

[22]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Epistemic indefinites: An overview , 2015 .

[23]  J. Groenendijk,et al.  Coreference and modality , 1996 .

[24]  C. Barker Parasitic scope , 2007 .

[25]  Sei-Rang Oh,et al.  Plurality markers across languages , 2006 .

[26]  Sven Lauer,et al.  Free Relatives With -ever: Meaning And Use. , 2009 .

[27]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  A semantic characterization of natural language determiners , 1986 .

[28]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Questions Under Discussion: Where Information Structure Meets Projective Content , 2017 .

[29]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking , 1993 .

[30]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From discourse to logic , 1993 .

[31]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency , 2000 .

[32]  Godehard Link,et al.  Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals , 1987 .

[33]  Jo-Wang Lin,et al.  Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese , 1996 .

[34]  David I. Beaver Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics , 2001 .

[35]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[36]  Hedde Zeijlstra,et al.  Sentential negation and negative concord , 2004 .

[37]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[38]  Roni Katzir,et al.  Structurally-defined alternatives , 2007 .

[39]  William Labov,et al.  Negative Attraction and Negative Concord in English Grammar. , 1972 .

[40]  J. Kuhn,et al.  Pluractionality, iconicity, and scope in French Sign Language , 2017 .

[41]  S. Solt Monotonicity, Closure and theSemantics of few , 2006 .

[42]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Negation and Disjunction in Discourse Representation Theory , 1995, J. Semant..

[43]  Reinhard Muskens,et al.  Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation , 1996 .

[44]  Jeremy Kuhn Pluractionality and distributive numerals , 2019, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[45]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Epistemic indefinites : exploring modality beyond the verbal domain , 2015 .

[46]  Jon Gajewski,et al.  Licensing strong NPIs , 2011 .

[47]  Rick Nouwen,et al.  On Dependent Pronouns and Dynamic Semantics , 2007, J. Philos. Log..

[48]  Adrian Brasoveanu Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions , 2013, J. Semant..

[49]  Annett Baier,et al.  Logic In Grammar Polarity Free Choice And Intervention , 2016 .

[50]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Negation And Negative Concord In Romance , 2000 .

[51]  Orvokki Tellervo Heinämäki,et al.  Semantics of English temporal connectives , 1974 .

[52]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Presuppositional TOO, Postsuppositional TOO , 2013 .

[53]  Jae-Woong Choe,et al.  Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity , 1987 .

[54]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  64. Negative and positive polarity items , 2011 .

[55]  D. Fox,et al.  On the characterization of alternatives , 2011 .

[56]  A. Giannakidou Affective Dependencies , 1999 .

[57]  Julian Grove Scope-taking and presupposition satisfaction , 2019 .

[58]  Rick Nouwen,et al.  Plural pronominal anaphora in context : dynamic aspects of quantification , 2003 .

[59]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Discourse Referents , 1969, COLING.

[60]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Modularity and intuitions in formal semantics: the case of polarity items , 2011 .

[61]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Donkey pluralities: plural information states versus non-atomic individuals , 2008 .

[62]  Jo-wang Lin,et al.  On Existential Polarity-WH-0Phrases in Chinese , 1998 .

[63]  Giorgio Magri A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures , 2009 .

[64]  Jeremy Kuhn,et al.  Dependent indefinites: the view from sign language , 2017, J. Semant..

[65]  Simon Charlow,et al.  The scope of alternatives: indefiniteness and islands , 2020, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[66]  Irene Heim,et al.  On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions , 2008 .

[67]  Lucas Champollion Covert distributivity in algebraic event semantics , 2016 .

[68]  David Beaver,et al.  3: Have You Noticed that Your Belly Button Lint Color is Related to the Color of Your Clothing? , 2002 .

[69]  Maziar Toosarvandani,et al.  Contrast and the structure of discourse , 2014 .

[70]  E. Keenan Beyond the frege boundary , 1992 .

[71]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection , 2001, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[72]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  In Defense of the Correspondence Hypothesis: Island Effects and Parasitic Constructions in Logical Form , 1992 .

[73]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[74]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity , 2004 .

[75]  R.A.M. van Rooij,et al.  Exhaustivity in dynamic semantics; referential and descriptive pronouns , 2001 .

[76]  Malte Zimmermann,et al.  Boys buying two sausages each: On the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity , 2002 .

[77]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition , 2007 .

[78]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[79]  Dylan Bumford,et al.  Split-scope definites: Relative superlatives and Haddock descriptions , 2017 .

[80]  D.J.N. vanEijck,et al.  Dynamic modal predicate logic , 1992 .

[81]  F. Zwarts Three Types of Polarity , 1997 .

[82]  M. H. van den Berg,et al.  Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse. The dynamics of nominal anaphora , 1996 .

[83]  Elena Herburger,et al.  The Negative Concord Puzzle Revisited , 2001 .

[84]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity , 1990 .

[85]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Analyses of negation in English. , 1972 .

[86]  Gregory Ward,et al.  Information Structure and Syntactic Structure , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[87]  V. Déprez,et al.  Two types of Negative Concord , 1997 .

[88]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  The semantics of topic-focus articulation , 1981 .

[89]  Maria Aloni,et al.  Quantification in Dynamic Semantics , 1997 .

[90]  Lisa Bylinina,et al.  On “zero” and semantic plurality , 2018, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.

[91]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Some observations on factivity , 1971 .

[92]  D. Cresti Extraction and reconstruction , 1995 .

[93]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Decomposing Modal Quantification , 2010, J. Semant..

[94]  S. Cable,et al.  Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in Tlingit (and beyond) , 2014 .

[95]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  How indefinites choose their scope , 2011 .

[96]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The acquisition of adjunct control is colored by the task , 2018, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.

[97]  Robert Henderson Dependent indefinites and their post-suppositions , 2014 .