Antagonistic and series elastic actuators: a comparative analysis on the energy consumption

Recent investigations show that compliant systems can be more safe and energy-efficient than conventional stiff actuated systems. As a result, researchers are increasingly implementing compliance within actuation systems using a variety of mechanisms. In general, these actuators can be grouped in 2 main categories. The first category includes all the actuation systems with a compliant element connected in series (SEA), while the second group contains all those systems that employ two actuators placed antagonistically. In both designs the ability to regulate the stiffness is essential in order to meet safety and/or performance demands. Energy consumption is a very important aspect to be considered, especially in autonomous robots. This paper presents a theoretical study on the energy consumption of variable stiffness actuators, comparing the amount of energy required in order to perform a certain task.

[1]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact soft actuator unit for small scale human friendly robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Stephen P. DeWeerth,et al.  Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design , 1993 .

[5]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[6]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Pneumatic muscle actuator technology: a light weight power system for a humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[7]  Conor James Walsh,et al.  Biomimetic Design of an Under-Actuated Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation , 2006 .

[8]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Effects of plantar fascia stiffness on the biomechanical responses of the ankle-foot complex. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[12]  P. Komi,et al.  Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Development of a compliance controller to reduce energy consumption for bipedal robots , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[14]  J. Hore,et al.  Control of joint rotations in overarm throws of different speeds made by dominant and nondominant arms. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.