Watershed prioritization of Palar sub-watershed based on the morphometric and land use analysis

Morphometric analysis is an indispensable tool for hydrological investigation that involves the development and management of drainage basin. This study characterizes the micro watersheds in the Palar sub-watershed using morphometric analysis and assesses its risk by land use and land cover features in a particular micro watershed. Palar sub-watershed is divided into 6 micro watersheds for prioritization based on morphometric and land use analysis. Several morphometric parameters (linear, shape and relief) are determined from the drainage map; ranks are assigned based on their capacity to induce erodability and degradation. Final ranking is based on the composite index calculated from the sum of the ranks of each morphometric parameter. Morphometric analysis reveals micro watersheds 5 and 6 as most susceptible and 2 and 3 as low susceptible. Land use is mapped using IRS ID LISS III satellite data. The risk in terms of watershed degradation involved to each micro watershed is based on the ranks of each land use feature, obtained from a similar composite index as that of morphometric analysis. Land use analysis shows that micro watersheds 2 and 4 fall under high priority category while 5 and 6 under low priority category. Integration of the morphometric and land use analysis shows that only micro watershed 1 falls under the same category in both analyses. Control measures are suggested to contain degradation depending on its specific land use pattern and morphometric features. This study can be used to prepare a comprehensive watershed plan for the development or for planning resource conservation strategies, by integrating land use features with the drainage characteristics of the region, in particular for a hill ecosystem as the prioritization is at micro level.

[1]  A. Scheidegger Drainage Basins and Large Scale Landscape Development , 1970 .

[2]  S. Schumm EVOLUTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SLOPES IN BADLANDS AT PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY , 1956 .

[3]  J. Finn,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Soil Erosion in the Rio Lempa Basin, Central America, Using the Universal Soil Loss Equation and Geographic Information Systems , 2005, Environmental management.

[4]  V. R. Desai,et al.  Prioritisation of subwatersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin: a remote sensing and gis approach , 1999 .

[5]  A. V. George,et al.  Morphometric Analysis and Micro-watershed Prioritization of Peruvanthanam Sub-watershed, the Manimala River Basin, Kerala, South India , 2011 .

[6]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  Sinuosity of Alluvial Rivers on the Great Plains , 1963 .

[7]  Akram Javed,et al.  Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters: A remote sensing and GIS based approach , 2011 .

[8]  Shakeel Ahmed,et al.  The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain , 2005 .

[9]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  GIS-based sediment assessment tool , 2005 .

[10]  P. E. Potter,et al.  A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area, Virginia and Tennessee. V. C. Miller , 1957 .

[11]  L. Mesa,et al.  Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumán, Argentina) , 2006 .

[12]  Peter C. Patton,et al.  Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls , 1976 .

[13]  R. Betson Drainage Basin Form and Process A Geomorphological Approach , 1974 .

[14]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[15]  A. N. Strahler Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks , 1964 .

[16]  Jobin Thomas,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the drainage system and its hydrological implications in the rain shadow regions, Kerala, India , 2011 .

[17]  V. C. Miller,et al.  quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee , 1953 .

[18]  V. Prasannakumar,et al.  Terrain evaluation through the assessment of geomorphometric parameters using DEM and GIS: case study of two major sub-watersheds in Attapady, South India , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[19]  A. N. Strahler Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. , 1952 .

[20]  Kenneth G. V. Smith,et al.  Standards for grading texture of erosional topography , 1950 .

[21]  T. Avery Natural Resources Measurements , 1975 .

[22]  Rizwan Ahmed,et al.  Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques , 2009 .