Improved assessment of operational performance is critical for studies of selection, training and human engineering as well as those examining the performance effects of environmental changes, chemicals or other stressors imposed by military duties. The present discussion focuses on what we consider to be the major problem with such enterprises – the lack of sensitivity of operational measures because of poor reliability. The well-documented impact of low field measure reliability includes the inability to demonstrate differences resulting from experimental treatments and the chronic underrepresentation of validity in predictive studies. This paper describes a general methodology for using specially-developed performance batteries as surrogates for real-world performances, in particular for determining whether such performance may be disrupted by environmental or chemical agents. The logical and metric rationale of surrogate measurement is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are discussed and compared to alternative approaches (job samples, synthetic tasks, etc.).
[1]
Robert S. Kennedy,et al.
A Video Test for Prediction of Tank Commander Performance
,
1984
.
[2]
S R WALLACE,et al.
CRITERIA FOR WHAT?
,
1965,
The American psychologist.
[3]
David W. Biers,et al.
Job Sample Tests as Predictors of M1 Gunnery Performance
,
1982
.
[4]
John E. Hunter,et al.
Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings.
,
1981
.
[5]
B. Green,et al.
Quantitative methods for literature reviews.
,
1984,
Annual review of psychology.
[6]
Norman E Lane,et al.
Issues in Performance Measurement for Military Aviation with Applications to Air Combat Maneuvering
,
1986
.
[7]
Ted R Mixon,et al.
An Annotated Bibliography of Objective Pilot Performance Measures
,
1982
.
[8]
J. Guilford.
Psychometric methods, 2nd ed.
,
1954
.