Robust Unit Commitment Using Information Gap Decision Theory

Recently, electricity utilization is increasing as a result of population growth. Hence, total fuel consumption of thermal units increases with their inefficient and uneconomical load dispatch. Moreover, uncertainty associated with electricity market prices changes daily profit of market operator. For this purpose, information gap decision theory (IGDT) is implemented on a multi-period unit commitment (UC) problem aiming to maximize total profit obtained from selling electricity to consumers. In this chapter, total revenue achieved from selling energy to customers minus total operational cost of thermal power plants is maximized considering ramp-up and ramp-down rates, minimum up- and downtimes, and production capacity of thermal generation stations in UC problem. Moreover, uncertainty of electricity prices is modeled using IGDT to assess how market operator can make a risk-averse decision at low market prices and obtain higher profit in comparison with base problem, which is solved with same prices. In other words, robustness mode of IGDT enables operator to find a good solution for hour-ahead scheduling of thermal units for underestimated energy rates in a way that total profit will not only be larger than a predefined critical profit but also is more than profit of UC problem, which is solved with same market prices and without application of IGDT strategy. Similarly, opportunistic mode of IGDT makes it possible to maximize profit for overestimated electricity prices so that it will not only be more than a target profit but also is larger than profit of UC problem, which is solved with same prices and without implementation of IGDT. To prove IGDT’s robustness and capability in modeling uncertainties, a ten-unit standard system is discussed in two case studies: case 1, without application of IGDT method, and case 2, with implementation of robustness and opportunistic modes of IGDT. It is found that risk-averse and risk-seeker decisions affect total cost, revenue, and expected profit. Both robust and opportunistic strategies cause more profit than that of obtained from solving UC problem, which is solved with underestimated or overestimated prices and without application of IGDT approach.

[1]  Xiaohui Yuan,et al.  Application of quantum-inspired binary gravitational search algorithm for thermal unit commitment with wind power integration , 2014 .

[2]  J. Watson,et al.  Multi-Stage Robust Unit Commitment Considering Wind and Demand Response Uncertainties , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Mathijs de Weerdt,et al.  Robust unit commitment with dispatchable wind power , 2018 .

[4]  Alireza Soroudi,et al.  Power System Optimization Modeling in GAMS , 2017 .

[5]  Jamshid Aghaei,et al.  IGDT-based robust optimal utilisation of wind power generation using coordinated flexibility resources , 2017 .

[6]  M. Sailaja Kumari,et al.  Demand response and pumped hydro storage scheduling for balancing wind power uncertainties: A probabilistic unit commitment approach , 2016 .

[7]  Kazem Zare,et al.  Risk-based optimal bidding strategy of generation company in day-ahead electricity market using information gap decision theory , 2013 .

[8]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  Multi-objective dynamic economic emission dispatch of electric power generation integrated with game theory based demand response programs , 2015 .

[9]  Abbas Rabiee,et al.  Information gap decision theory approach to deal with wind power uncertainty in unit commitment , 2017 .

[10]  Ruiwei Jiang,et al.  Weekly Two-Stage Robust Generation Scheduling for Hydrothermal Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Yuping Huang,et al.  Two-stage stochastic unit commitment model including non-generation resources with conditional value-at-risk constraints , 2014 .

[12]  Hamish Waterer,et al.  Hydro-electric unit commitment subject to uncertain demand , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Jaspreet Singh Dhillon,et al.  Profit based unit commitment using hybrid optimization technique , 2018 .

[14]  Antonio Simoes Costa,et al.  Hydroelectric unit commitment for power plants composed of distinct groups of generating units , 2016 .

[15]  Abdollah Ahmadi,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-integer linear programming for day-ahead hydro-thermal self-scheduling considering price uncertainty and forced outage rate , 2017 .

[16]  Amir Abdollahi,et al.  Optimal reserve market clearing considering uncertain demand response using information gap decision theory , 2018 .

[17]  Mostafa Kazemi,et al.  Security constrained unit commitment with flexibility in natural gas transmission delivery , 2015 .

[18]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Robust unit commitment considering uncertain demand response , 2015 .

[19]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  Chapter 2 – Uncertainty , 2006 .

[20]  He Li,et al.  Robust hydroelectric unit commitment considering integration of large-scale photovoltaic power: A case study in China , 2018, Applied Energy.

[21]  Gevork B. Gharehpetian,et al.  Integration of smart grid technologies in stochastic multi-objective unit commitment: An economic emission analysis , 2018, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[22]  Francisco D. Galiana,et al.  Generalized Sigma approach to unit commitment with uncertain wind power generation , 2015 .

[23]  Jong-Keun Park,et al.  Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment with wind power generation based on dynamic line rating , 2018, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.