Usability and Design Guidelines of Smart Canes for Users with Visual Impairments

A white cane is one of the most common mobility aids for the visually impaired. However, it does not help users with visual impairments find obstacles at head- or knee-level, or at distances greater than 1 m. To overcome these difficulties, smart canes with vibration alerts and an extended obstacle detection range have been introduced. However, several usability problems mean that users with visual impairments rarely adopt a smart cane. The goal of this study was to understand the potential for using a smart cane, along with the existing usability problems and then to develop design guidelines for improved smart canes. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to address these goals. A quantitative evaluation was performed of users with visual impairments using a prototype smart cane. Then, in-depth interviews of cane users were conducted. The results showed that a smart cane was more effective in avoiding obstacles than a white cane, but there were several potential usability problems. On the basis of the results, design guidelines for a smart cane prototype were devised.

[1]  Yolaine Bourda,et al.  A Context-aware Locomotion Assistance Device for the Blind , 2004, BCS HCI.

[2]  B. Ambler,et al.  The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  C I Howarth,et al.  The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[4]  Roger Coleman,et al.  A designer-centred approach , 2003 .

[5]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  (Computer) vision without sight , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[6]  J. J. Neve,et al.  Improved mobility and independence of night-blind people using night-vision goggles. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Albert Liu,et al.  GPS Integrated Smart Cane for the Blind , 2009 .

[8]  M. Balakrishnan,et al.  'Smart' Cane for the Visually Impaired: Design and Controlled Field Testing of an Affordable Obstacle Detection System , 2010 .

[9]  Ahmed A. El-Masry,et al.  Mobile Information Communication Technologies Adoption in Developing Countries: Effects and Implications , 2010 .

[10]  Mansooreh Mollaghasemi,et al.  Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  C. Hamonet.  Les personnes en situation de handicap , 2010 .

[12]  Timothy S. Miller,et al.  The design of 3D haptic widgets , 1999, SI3D.

[13]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences , 1982 .

[14]  Carter C. Collins,et al.  On Mobility Aids for the Blind , 1985 .

[15]  A. Streri,et al.  Touching for knowing : cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception , 2003 .

[16]  Yolaine Bourda,et al.  Electronic Locomotion Aids for the Blind: Towards More Assistive Systems , 2006, Intelligent Paradigms for Assistive and Preventive Healthcare.

[17]  Aaron Steinfeld,et al.  BlindAid: An Electronic Travel Aid for the Blind , 2007 .

[18]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[19]  R. Manduchi,et al.  Mobility-Related Accidents Experienced by People with Visual Impairment , 2010 .

[20]  Daniel M. Green,et al.  Vision and Hearing , 1989 .

[21]  Eric Bergman,et al.  Towards Accessible Human-Computer Interaction1 , 1995 .

[22]  . LarisaDunai.  Design, modeling and analysis of object localization through acoustical signals for cognitive electronic travel aid for blind people , 2011 .

[23]  Rohan Paul,et al.  Cane Mounted Knee-Above Obstacle Detection and Warning System for the Visually Impaired , 2007 .

[24]  K. Boman.  [On cutaneous sensitivity]. , 1960, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[25]  Kajatheepan Kanagaratnam.  Smart Mobility Cane: Design of Obstacle Detection , 2009 .

[26]  Iwan Ulrich,et al.  The GuideCane-applying mobile robot technologies to assist the visually impaired , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[27]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction , 2002 .

[28]  Henry S.J. Robben,et al.  How Consumers Learn From and About Products: the Impact of Direct Experience , 1998 .

[29]  James E. Birren,et al.  Behavioral slowing with age: Causes, organization, and consequences. , 1980 .

[30]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Ability-performance relationships as a function of age and task experience for a data entry task , 1998 .

[31]  김만두,et al.  시력 손상과 시각 장애(Visual Impairment and Blindness) , 2011 .

[32]  D. Mahar,et al.  Investigating users' intuitive interaction with complex artefacts. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Jason Dowling,et al.  Mobility assessment using simulated Arti.cial Human Vision , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops.

[34]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Haptic virtual reality for blind computer users , 1998, Assets '98.

[35]  Vincent Lévesque.  Blindness, Technology and Haptics , 2005 .

[36]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Studying Usability In Sitro: Simulating Real World Phenomena in Controlled Environments , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  L. Poon.  Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues. , 1980 .

[38]  Jason A. Dowling,et al.  Mobility enhancement using simulated artificial human vision , 2007 .

[39]  Timo Jokela,et al.  When good things happen to bad products: where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? , 2004, INTR.

[40]  David H. Rose,et al.  Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning , 2002 .

[41]  Luqiang Xu,et al.  Electronic travel aids for the blind based on sensory substitution , 2010, 2010 5th International Conference on Computer Science & Education.

[42]  David Clark-Carter.  Factors affecting blind mobility , 1985 .

[43]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Blind guidance using mobile computer vision: a usability study , 2010, ASSETS '10.

[44]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population , 2003 .

[45]  A. Welford.  Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[46]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Increased Response-time Variability is Associated with Reduced Inferior Parietal Activation during Episodic Recognition in Aging , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  Inventory of Electronic Mobility Aids for Persons with Visual Impairments: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[48]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Visual requirements of mobility (A) , 1983 .

[49]  D. McAdams,et al.  A Framework and Representation for Universal Product Design , 2022 .

[50]  L. Kay,et al.  A sonar aid to enhance spatial perception of the blind: engineering design and evaluation , 1974 .