Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Changing the Personality of a Face : Perceived Big Two and Big Five Personality Factors Modeled in Real Photographs

General, spontaneous evaluations of strangers based on their faces have been shown to reflect judgments of these persons' intention and ability to harm. These evaluations can be mapped onto a 2D space defined by the dimensions trustworthiness (intention) and dominance (ability). Here we go beyond general evaluations and focus on more specific personality judgments derived from the Big Two and Big Five personality concepts. In particular, we investigate whether Big Two/Big Five personality judgments can be mapped onto the 2D space defined by the dimensions trustworthiness and dominance. Results indicate that judgments of the Big Two personality dimensions almost perfectly map onto the 2D space. In contrast, at least 3 of the Big Five dimensions (i.e., neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness) go beyond the 2D space, indicating that additional dimensions are necessary to describe more specific face-based personality judgments accurately. Building on this evidence, we model the Big Two/Big Five personality dimensions in real facial photographs. Results from 2 validation studies show that the Big Two/Big Five are perceived reliably across different samples of faces and participants. Moreover, results reveal that participants differentiate reliably between the different Big Two/Big Five dimensions. Importantly, this high level of agreement and differentiation in personality judgments from faces likely creates a subjective reality which may have serious consequences for those being perceived-notably, these consequences ensue because the subjective reality is socially shared, irrespective of the judgments' validity. The methodological approach introduced here might prove useful in various psychological disciplines. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  I. Deary,et al.  The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E , 2000 .

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Universals and Cultural Differences in Forming Personality Trait Judgments From Faces , 2011 .

[4]  J. Darley,et al.  Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. , 1980 .

[5]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[6]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality trait structure as a human universal. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[7]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[8]  Michael C. Mangini,et al.  Making the ineffable explicit: estimating the information employed for face classifications , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  A. Abele,et al.  Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. , 1994 .

[13]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Exchanging Faces in Images , 2004, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[15]  Sara C. Verosky,et al.  Personality Impressions from Facial Appearance , 2011 .

[16]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[17]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Beatrice Rammstedt,et al.  Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): , 2005 .

[19]  J. M. Digman Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  M. Leary,et al.  Big Two Personality and Big Three Mate Preferences , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  D. Perrett,et al.  Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. , 2007, British journal of psychology.

[22]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Facial symmetry is positively associated with self-reported extraversion , 2007 .

[23]  Jay Belsky,et al.  The relations between parents' Big Five personality factors and parenting: a meta-analytic review. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification. , 1989 .

[25]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Work and personality : Use of the NEO-PI-R in industrial/organisational psychology , 1996 .

[26]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. , 1991 .

[27]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Reverse Correlating Social Face Perception , 2012 .

[28]  Heather M. Coon,et al.  Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  A. Poropat A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[31]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream , 2000 .

[32]  Ulrik Plesner Jacobsen,et al.  Interpretation of Appearance: The Effect of Facial Features on First Impressions and Personality , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  B. Munro Assessment of Instruments , 1993, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[34]  L. R. Goldberg The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[35]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[36]  Matthew Turk,et al.  A Morphable Model For The Synthesis Of 3D Faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[37]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. , 1992 .

[38]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Explaining Negativity Biases in Evaluation and Choice Behavior: Theory and Research , 1984 .

[39]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[40]  A. Todorov,et al.  Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Simone Rehm,et al.  The Big Five , 2015, Informatik-Spektrum.

[42]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Modeling Social Perception of Faces , 2011 .

[44]  Sami Romdhani,et al.  A 3D Face Model for Pose and Illumination Invariant Face Recognition , 2009, 2009 Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance.

[45]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  R. Ward,et al.  Internal Facial Features are Signals of Personality and Health , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation , 1998 .

[48]  D. Sachau,et al.  Cognitive Ability, Emotional Intelligence, and the Big Five Personality Dimensions as Predictors of Criminal Investigator Performance , 2011 .

[49]  M. Davies,et al.  Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero acquaintance , 2003 .

[50]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance , 2022 .

[51]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[52]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. , 2009 .

[53]  Nicholas,et al.  CHAPTER 2 First Impressions Peeking at the Neural Underpinnings , 2012 .

[54]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Portraits made to measure: manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[55]  A. Young,et al.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence , 2008 .

[57]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[58]  C. Judd,et al.  The Influence of Afrocentric Facial Features in Criminal Sentencing , 2004, Psychological science.

[59]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[60]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Masculine (Instrumental) and Feminine (Expressive) Traits , 1981 .

[61]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[62]  Yelena Tsarenko,et al.  The Big Five and brand personality: Investigating the impact of consumer personality on preferences towards particular brand personality , 2009 .

[63]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Personal Attributes Questionnaire , 2012 .

[65]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .