Interaction in asset-based value creation within innovation networks : the case of software industry

Knowledge management is a new academic discipline that has been growing during the past decade but is still in its embryonic stage with much potential left. What makes knowledge management an attractive research field is its multi-discipline perspective. In the knowledge management the context is important because the value of an organization’s knowledge is contextbased. In this research the context are the innovation networks within the software industry and thus besides knowledge management the research contributes to the software business literature. The aim of this study was to get an understanding about the interaction the in asset-based value creation within innovation networks. This was done by examining the effects of the interaction in asset development and deployment in innovation networks, where activities are related to research, development and innovation collaboration. This was studied against the theoretical framework that was developed in this research based on earlier studies. This study shows that in the examined research context actors from outside of the software industry have a direct effect on both asset development and deployment based on their funding requirements and aims. The study shows that in this wider environment trust, openness and mutual benefits are important factors of the interaction atmosphere, regarding where funding is targeted and where the actual work is done. This study shows the importance of the interaction framework as a motivator and an entity that enables direct benefits to participating actors from their interaction and collaboration. It also shows that some of the episodes where interactions occur need to be regular, on-going and have a certain rhythm. As a result of this research a framework of interaction in the asset-based value creation in innovation networks was created. It shows how funding mechanisms affect the asset development and deployment, as well as that some episodes where interactions occur are especially important, because they limit or support value creation. Moreover, the role, contributions, aims and motivations of actors are seemingly different within these episodes.

[1]  Heli Päätalo Stakeholder interactions in cross-functional productization : the case of mobile software development , 2014 .

[2]  Pilar Rodríguez,et al.  Combining lean thinking and agile software development : how do software-intensive companies use them in practice? , 2013 .

[3]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[4]  Jan Bosch,et al.  From software product lines to software ecosystems , 2009, SPLC.

[5]  Craig C. Lundberg LEARNING IN AND BY ORGANIZATIONS: THREE CONCEPTUAL ISSUES , 1995 .

[6]  M. Castells Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[7]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Actors, resources, activities and commitments , 2009 .

[8]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Klaus Marius Hansen,et al.  Software ecosystems - A systematic literature review , 2013, J. Syst. Softw..

[10]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[11]  Jyrki Ali-Yrkkö,et al.  Ohjelmistoalan nykytila Suomessa , 2008 .

[12]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective , 2007 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[15]  Ulla Kemi Adaptation to growing season length in the perennial Arabidopsis lyrata , 2013 .

[16]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[17]  A. Neely,et al.  The dynamics of value creation: mapping your intellectual performance drivers , 2004 .

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[19]  Tuomo Jaakkonen,et al.  Intra- and interspecific social information use in nest site selection of a cavity-nesting bird community , 2014 .

[21]  Rogério Cerávolo Calia,et al.  Innovation networks: From technological development to business model reconfiguration , 2007 .

[22]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy , 2000 .

[23]  B. Lev Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[24]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[25]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[26]  Kwee Keong Choong Intellectual Capital : Definitions, Categorization and Reporting Models , 2008 .

[27]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[28]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? , 2000 .

[29]  Suvi Ponnikas Establishing conservation management for avian threatened species , 2014 .

[30]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[31]  S. Sallinen,et al.  Development of Industrial Software Supplier Firms in the ICT Cluster , 2002 .

[32]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text , 2000 .

[33]  David G. Messerschmitt,et al.  Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry , 2003 .

[34]  Gilles Saint-Paul,et al.  Information Sharing and Cumulative Innovation in Business Networks , 2003 .

[35]  Melvin Simensky,et al.  The new role of intellectual property in commercial transactions : recent trends in the valuation, exploitation and protection of intellectual property , 1994 .

[36]  H. J. Smith,et al.  The power of business models , 2005 .

[37]  Annabel Bismuth,et al.  Creating value from intellectual assets , 2008 .

[38]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[39]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[40]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  International technology transfer and the technology gap , 1998 .

[41]  Micheal J. Kelly,et al.  Managing Alliance Relationships: Key Challenges in the Early Stages of Collaboration , 2002 .

[42]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008) , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[44]  Sanjiv Gossain,et al.  Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem , 1998 .

[45]  Olli J. Loukola,et al.  Information networks among species : adaptations and counter-adaptations in acquiring and hiding information , 2014 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[47]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[48]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same? , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[49]  J. Holm Catalytic pretreatment and hydrolysis of fibre sludge into reducing sugars , 2013 .

[50]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: A case study in telecom italia future centre , 2013 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[52]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[53]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[54]  Ard-Pieter de Man,et al.  The Network Economy: Strategy, Structure and Management , 2004 .

[55]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[56]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Ward Hanson Mobilizing invisible assets : Hiroyuki Itami with Thomas W. Roehl, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987) pp. xi+186, $20.00 , 1988 .

[58]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[59]  Alison M. Dean,et al.  Can Ideas be Capital? Factors of Production in the Postindustrial Economy: A Review and Critique , 2007 .

[60]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[61]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[63]  Karina Funk Sustainability and Performance , 2003 .

[64]  Andrew C. Inkpen Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances , 1998 .

[65]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics of Market Structure and Innovation in the Western European Software Industry , 1996 .

[66]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[67]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[68]  Vanessa Goldoni,et al.  Knowledge management metrics in software development companies in Brazil , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[69]  Karin Väyrynen,et al.  Evolution of software business in industrial companies: Resources, capabilities and strategy , 2009 .

[70]  Norvell Northcutt,et al.  Interactive Qualitative Analysis , 2004 .

[71]  Pavlo Ardanov Priming capacities of endophytic Methylobacterium sp. on potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) , 2013 .

[72]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A follow-up ranking of academic journals , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  O. Vuolteenaho,et al.  Genetic analysis of demography and selection in Lyrate rockcress (Arabidopsis lyrata) populations , 2013 .

[74]  H. Håkansson,et al.  A Model of Industrial Networks , 1992 .

[75]  E. Virtanen,et al.  Effects of haulm killing and gibberellic acid on seed potato ( Solanum tuberosum L. ) and techniques for micro- and minituber production in northern latitudes , 2014 .

[76]  N. Bontis,et al.  THE KNOWLEDGE TOOLBOX: A Review of the Tools Available To Measure and Manage Intangible Resources , 1999 .

[77]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[78]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[79]  Wei Li,et al.  Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross-cultural context , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[80]  Annie Green,et al.  A Framework of Intangible Valuation Areas and Antecedents , 2007, ECKM.

[81]  E. Vatka Boreal populations facing climatic and habitat changes , 2014 .

[82]  Romain Robbes,et al.  The Small Project Observatory: Visualizing software ecosystems , 2010, Sci. Comput. Program..

[83]  D. Teece Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[84]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[85]  Sitwat Langrial Exploring the influence of persuasive reminders and virtual rehearsal on the efficacy of health behavior change support system , 2014 .

[86]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[87]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  VALUE CREATION BY FIRMS. , 1996 .

[88]  Florian Matusek Selective privacy protection for video surveillance , 2014 .

[89]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[90]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[91]  N. Bontis Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[92]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[93]  Melissa A. Schilling Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[94]  Jürgen H. Daum Intangible Assets and Value Creation , 2002 .

[95]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[96]  Debby McNichols,et al.  Optimal knowledge transfer methods: a Generation X perspective , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[97]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures / Clifford Geertz , 1973 .

[98]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  The Business of Software: What Every Manager, Programmer, and Entrepreneur Must Know to Thrive and Survive in Good Times and Bad , 2004 .

[99]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism , 1999 .

[100]  Pedro López-Sáez,et al.  External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledge-intensive clusters , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[101]  R. Grant Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm 111 Transferability , 2007 .

[102]  A. Kopatz Genetic structure of the brown bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Northern Europe , 2014 .

[103]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[104]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[105]  Richard Makadok Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[106]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[107]  Ravi S. Achrol,et al.  Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm , 1997 .

[108]  M. Isomursu Host–parasite interactions of boreal forest grouse and their intestinal helminth parasites , 2014 .