Individual differences in metabolomics: individualised responses and between-metabolite relationships

Many metabolomics studies aim to find ‘biomarkers’: sets of molecules that are consistently elevated or decreased upon experimental manipulation. Biological effects, however, often manifest themselves along a continuum of individual differences between the biological replicates in the experiment. Such differences are overlooked or even diminished by methods in standard use for metabolomics, although they may contain a wealth of information on the experiment. Properly understanding individual differences is crucial for generating knowledge in fields like personalised medicine, evolution and ecology. We propose to use simultaneous component analysis with individual differences constraints (SCA-IND), a data analysis method from psychology that focuses on these differences. This method constructs axes along the natural biochemical differences between biological replicates, comparable to principal components. The model may shed light on changes in the individual differences between experimental groups, but also on whether these differences correspond to, e.g., responders and non-responders or to distinct chemotypes. Moreover, SCA-IND reveals the individuals that respond most to a manipulation and are best suited for further experimentation. The method is illustrated by the analysis of individual differences in the metabolic response of cabbage plants to herbivory. The model reveals individual differences in the response to shoot herbivory, where two ‘response chemotypes’ may be identified. In the response to root herbivory the model shows that individual plants differ strongly in response dynamics. Thereby SCA-IND provides a hitherto unavailable view on the chemical diversity of the induced plant response, that greatly increases understanding of the system.

[1]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Simultaneous Components Analysis , 1992 .

[2]  Yanming Zhu,et al.  Chemotype-dependent metabolic response to methyl jasmonate elicitation in Artemisia annua. , 2011, Planta medica.

[3]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Crossfit analysis: a novel method to characterize the dynamics of induced plant responses , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  H. Law Research methods for multimode data analysis , 1984 .

[5]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure , 1994 .

[6]  R. Dixon,et al.  Metabolic profiling of Medicago truncatula cell cultures reveals the effects of biotic and abiotic elicitors on metabolism. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Between Metabolite Relationships: an essential aspect of metabolic change , 2011, Metabolomics.

[8]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[9]  Age K Smilde,et al.  The photographer and the greenhouse: how to analyse plant metabolomics data. , 2010, Phytochemical analysis : PCA.

[10]  John C. Lindon,et al.  Pattern recognition methods and applications in biomedical magnetic resonance , 2001 .

[11]  J. J. Jansen,et al.  ASCA: analysis of multivariate data obtained from an experimental design , 2005 .

[12]  O. Fiehn,et al.  Differential metabolic networks unravel the effects of silent plant phenotypes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Berkenbos-Smit Statistical data processing in clinical proteomics , 2009 .

[14]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences , 2003 .

[15]  Michel G Bergeron,et al.  Rapid molecular theranostics in infectious diseases. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[16]  David I. Ellis,et al.  Metabolomics: Current analytical platforms and methodologies , 2005 .

[17]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective , 2004 .

[18]  P. Phillips,et al.  Comparative quantitative genetics : evolution of the G matrix , 2002 .

[19]  David E. Booth,et al.  Multi-Way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2005, Technometrics.

[20]  R. Bro,et al.  Multiway chemometric analysis of the metabolic response to toxins monitored by NMR , 2005 .

[21]  D. Herms,et al.  The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[22]  N. V. van Dam,et al.  A heritable glucosinolate polymorphism within natural populations of Barbarea vulgaris. , 2006, Phytochemistry.

[23]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[24]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data , 2004, Bioinform..

[25]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data , 1988 .

[26]  Johan Trygg,et al.  Chemometrics in metabonomics. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  O. Fiehn,et al.  Interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[28]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[29]  Robert P. Bodnaryk,et al.  Potent effect of jasmonates on indole glucosinolates in oilseed rape and mustard , 1994 .

[30]  Sonia J. Miller,et al.  The metabolic transition during disease following infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[31]  J. Fahey,et al.  Broccoli sprouts: an exceptionally rich source of inducers of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogens. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi-way Analysis with Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2004 .

[33]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data , 2005, Bioinform..

[34]  Joop J A van Loon,et al.  Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. , 2009, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  J. J. Jansen,et al.  Identification of Biologically Relevant Compounds in Aboveground and Belowground Induced Volatile Blends , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[36]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  ANOVA–principal component analysis and ANOVA–simultaneous component analysis: a comparison , 2011 .

[37]  ANALYSIS OF THE INDIVIDUAL , 1934 .