Coordinated bidding strategy in synchronized electricity and natural gas markets

With the growing installation of natural gas fired power plants (NGFPPs), more and more generation companies are engaging in both electricity and natural gas markets as big players simultaneously. Recognizing the inefficiencies caused by scheduling discontinuities between the two markets, studies on the improvement of the living natural gas market are emerging. This paper presents a bi-level bidding strategy for generation companies while considering a possible scenario of synchronized electricity and natural gas markets. Instead of only aligning the day-ahead timing, a market clearing mechanism analogized from the electricity market is also applied to an intraday natural gas market with corresponding locational marginal price formulation. The upper level problem maximizes the generation company's profit, while the two lower level problems maximize the social welfare of both markets. The bi-level model is reformulated to a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints, and then linearized. Case study on a simple coupled network investigates the feasibility of the proposed strategy. Finally, some suggestions are made for further research on the intersection of electricity and natural gas markets.

[1]  Market clearing model for Singapore electricity market incorporating transmission loss , 2016, 2016 Asian Conference on Energy, Power and Transportation Electrification (ACEPT).

[2]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Impact of Public Aggregate Wind Forecasts on Electricity Market Outcomes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[3]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Coordinated Scheduling for Interdependent Electric Power and Natural Gas Infrastructures , 2017 .

[4]  J. Pang,et al.  Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach , 2000 .

[5]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Natural Gas Transmission Constraints , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Aleksandr Rudkevich,et al.  Locational Marginal Pricing of Natural Gas subject to Engineering Constraints , 2017, HICSS.

[7]  Stefanos Delikaraoglou,et al.  Exploiting flexibility in coupled electricity and natural gas markets: A price-based approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech.

[8]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Electricity-Natural Gas Operation Planning With Hourly Demand Response for Deployment of Flexible Ramp , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[9]  Pablo Dueñas Martínez,et al.  Electricity and natural gas interdependency: comparison of two methodologies for coupling large market models within the European regulatory framework , 2016 .

[10]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Strategic Offering and Equilibrium in Coupled Gas and Electricity Markets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Sandra Elizabeth Jenkins Interdependency of electricity and natural gas markets in the United States : a dynamic computational model , 2014 .

[12]  Hantao Cui,et al.  Day-ahead coordinated operation of utility-scale electricity and natural gas networks considering demand response based virtual power plants , 2016 .

[13]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Coordination of Interdependent Natural Gas and Electricity Infrastructures for Firming the Variability of Wind Energy in Stochastic Day-Ahead Scheduling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[14]  Todd Schatzki,et al.  The Interdependence of Electricity and Natural Gas: Current Factors and Future Prospects , 2012 .

[15]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Security-Constrained Co-Optimization Planning of Electricity and Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructures , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  A. Conejo,et al.  Pool Strategy of a Producer With Endogenous Formation of Locational Marginal Prices , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.