Guidelines for the preparation of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns.

Ceramic inlays and partial crowns have become scientifically recognized posterior restorations. Their clinical effectiveness depends on the development of durable dental ceramics and luting materials as well as an effective bonding system. Therefore, these factors were in the focus of interest in the past. In contrast, only little attention was given to preparation techniques. However, current studies show that special preparation rules should be followed to ensure best fitting CAD/CAM ceramic restorations and long-lasting clinical success. This paper describes preparation requirements by means of detailed three-dimensional schematic drawings and then deduces the clinical procedure for the preparation of ceramic inlays and partial crowns with standardized preparation instruments.

[1]  B. H. Şen,et al.  In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  S. Ebisu,et al.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. , 1998, Operative dentistry.

[3]  G. Rappelli,et al.  Survival rate of ceramic inlays. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  B Reiss,et al.  Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. , 2006, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[6]  K. Hiller,et al.  Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  R. Hickel,et al.  Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[8]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[9]  K. Hiller,et al.  Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[10]  G. Arnetzl Biomechanical examination of inlay geometries--is there a basic biomechanical principle? , 2009, International Journal of Computerized Dentistry.

[11]  K. Hiller,et al.  Curing efficiency of different polymerization methods through ceramic restorations , 2001, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  R. Banks Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  R. Hickel,et al.  Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. , 2004, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[14]  W Gernet,et al.  All-ceramic resin-bonded bridges. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis study. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[15]  J. Roulet,et al.  Marginal adaptation with glass-ceramic inlays adhesively luted with glycerine gel. , 1991, Quintessence international.

[16]  A McDonald,et al.  Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. , 2001, Dental update.

[17]  K. Anusavice,et al.  Ceramic design concepts based on stress distribution analysis. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[18]  M. Fradeani,et al.  Versatility of IPS Empress restorations. Part II: Veneers, inlays, and onlays. , 1996, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[19]  K. Anusavice,et al.  Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  G. Rappelli,et al.  Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate. , 1999, The journal of adhesive dentistry.