Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Network meta-analysis synthesizes several studies of multiple treatment comparisons to simultaneously provide inference for all treatments in the network. It can often strengthen inference on pairwise comparisons by borrowing evidence from other comparisons in the network. Current network meta-analysis approaches are derived from either conventional pairwise meta-analysis or hierarchical Bayesian methods. This paper introduces a new approach for network meta-analysis by combining confidence distributions (CDs). Instead of combining point estimators from individual studies in the conventional approach, the new approach combines CDs which contain richer information than point estimators and thus achieves greater efficiency in its inference. The proposed CD approach can e ciently integrate all studies in the network and provide inference for all treatments even when individual studies contain only comparisons of subsets of the treatments. Through numerical studies with real and simulated data sets, the proposed approach is shown to outperform or at least equal the traditional pairwise meta-analysis and a commonly used Bayesian hierarchical model. Although the Bayesian approach may yield comparable results with a suitably chosen prior, it is highly sensitive to the choice of priors (especially the prior of the between-trial covariance structure), which is often subjective. The CD approach is a general frequentist approach and is prior-free. Moreover, it can always provide a proper inference for all the treatment effects regardless of the between-trial covariance structure.

[1]  D J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[4]  A Morabito,et al.  Prevention of First Bleeding in Cirrhosis , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Dan Jackson,et al.  Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta‐analyses , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  P Bélisle,et al.  Bayesian and mixed Bayesian/likelihood criteria for sample size determination. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Minge Xie,et al.  Confidence distribution (CD) -- distribution estimator of a parameter , 2007, 0708.0976.

[9]  Guang Yang Meta-Analysis Through Combining Confidence Distributions , 2013 .

[10]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  The Dempster-Shafer calculus for statisticians , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[11]  S G Thompson,et al.  A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  S L Normand,et al.  Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Minge Xie,et al.  A note on Dempster-Shafer recombination of confidence distributions , 2012 .

[14]  G. Lu,et al.  Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons , 2006 .

[15]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian–Laird and alternative random‐effects model meta‐analyses – an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta‐analyses , 2011, Research synthesis methods.

[16]  K. Singh,et al.  Confidence Distribution, the Frequentist Distribution Estimator of a Parameter: A Review , 2013 .

[17]  G. Lu,et al.  Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Chuanhai Liu,et al.  Inferential Models: A Framework for Prior-Free Posterior Probabilistic Inference , 2012, 1206.4091.

[19]  Simon Wandel,et al.  Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis , 2007, The Lancet.

[20]  Joseph C Cappelleri,et al.  Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[21]  Lu Tian,et al.  Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction. , 2009, Biostatistics.

[22]  S Dias,et al.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  David C Hoaglin,et al.  Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  Minge Xie,et al.  Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[25]  N. Hjort,et al.  Confidence and Likelihood * , 2002 .

[26]  M C Simmonds,et al.  Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  Minge Xie,et al.  Combining information from independent sources through confidence distributions , 2005, math/0504507.

[28]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  A modified random-effect procedure for combining risk difference in sets of 2×2 tables from clinical trials , 1993 .

[29]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Recent developments in meta‐analysis , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  Minge Xie,et al.  Confidence Distributions and a Unifying Framework for Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[31]  T. Lumley Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Kurex Sidik,et al.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  Dungang Liu,et al.  Combining information for heterogeneous studies and rare events studies: A confidence distribution approach , 2012 .