Time Limits During Visual Foraging Reveal Flexible Working Memory Templates
暂无分享,去创建一个
Árni Kristjánsson | Ian M Thornton | Tómas Kristjánsson | I. Thornton | Á. Kristjánsson | Tómas Kristjánsson
[1] Valerie M. Beck,et al. Simultaneous Control of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Representations , 2012, Psychological science.
[2] Arni Kristjánsson,et al. The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: From passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[3] H. Müller,et al. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] V. Lamme,et al. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[5] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] Edward F. Ester,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .
[7] B. Hood,et al. Is Visual Search Really like Foraging? , 2001, Perception.
[8] A. Treisman. Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli , 1977 .
[9] Edward Vul,et al. A Bayesian Optimal Foraging Model of Human Visual Search , 2012, Psychological science.
[10] S Magnussen,et al. The psychophysics of perceptual memory , 1999, Psychological research.
[11] K. Oberauer. Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[12] M. Dawkins. Shifts of ‘attention’ in chicks during feeding , 1971 .
[13] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze , 2016, i-Perception.
[14] J. Wolfe,et al. What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .
[15] H. Egeth,et al. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[16] P. Cavanagh,et al. The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.
[17] A. Bond,et al. Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attention threshold hypothesis. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[18] D. A. Riley,et al. Visual search for natural grains in pigeons (Columba livia): search images and selective attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[19] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[20] C. Bundesen. A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.
[21] Thomas T. Hills,et al. Adaptive Lévy Processes and Area-Restricted Search in Human Foraging , 2013, PloS one.
[22] G. Woodman,et al. The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] F. Tong,et al. Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.
[24] P. Cavanagh,et al. Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[25] R W Remington,et al. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] C M Moore,et al. Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] Paul M Bays,et al. Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.
[28] P. Roelfsema,et al. The Distributed Nature of Working Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[29] Irida Mance,et al. Visual working memory. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[30] Martin Eimer,et al. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] G. Woodman,et al. Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[32] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Common Attentional Constraints in Visual Foraging , 2014, PloS one.
[33] G. Humphreys,et al. Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[34] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal , 2008, Vision Research.
[35] S. Shettleworth,et al. Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[36] Edward K. Vogel,et al. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.
[37] J. Jonides,et al. Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[38] Harold Pashler,et al. A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.
[39] B. Green,et al. Color coding in a visual search task. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.
[40] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[41] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[42] J. P. Cavanagh,et al. The equivalence of target and nontarget processing in visual search , 1971 .
[43] George A. Alvarez,et al. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set by total information load, not number of objects , 2010 .
[44] Yuhong Jiang,et al. Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[45] P. Roelfsema,et al. Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .
[46] Christian N L Olivers,et al. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] Á. Kristjánsson,et al. Understanding visual attention in childhood: Insights from a new visual foraging task , 2016, Cognitive research: principles and implications.
[48] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Are Foraging Patterns in Humans Related to Working Memory and Inhibitory Control , 2017 .
[49] Todd S Horowitz,et al. The multi-item localization (MILO) task: Measuring the spatiotemporal context of vision for action , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[50] Mark W. Greenlee,et al. Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory , 1991, Vision Research.
[51] Pieter R Roelfsema,et al. Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time , 2009, Psychological research.
[52] Chen Shuo. The Capacity of Visual Working Memory for Motion Direction of Objects , 2006 .
[53] Nancy B. Carlisle,et al. How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention , 2018, Psychological research.
[54] Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al. Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[55] Jan Theeuwes,et al. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[56] Christian N. L. Olivers,et al. The costs of switching attentional sets , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.