Predicting Traffic and Risk Exposure in the Maritime Industry

Maritime regulators, port authorities, and industry require the ability to predict risk exposure of shipping activities at a micro and macro level to optimize asset allocation and to mitigate and prevent incidents. This article introduces the concept of a strategic planning tool by making use of the multi-layered risk estimation framework (MLREF), which accounts for ship specific risk, vessel traffic densities, and meets ocean conditions at the macro level. This article’s main contribution is to provide a traffic and risk exposure prediction routine that allows the traffic forecast to be distributed across the shipping route network to allow for predicting scenarios at the macro level (e.g., covering larger geographic areas) and micro level (e.g., passage way, particular route of interest). In addition, the micro level is introduced by providing a theoretical idea to integrate location specific spatial rate ratios along with the effect of the risk control option to perform sensitivity analysis of risk exposure prediction scenarios. Aspects of the risk exposure estimation routine were tested via a pilot study for the Australian region using a comprehensive and unique combination of datasets. Sources of uncertainties for risk assessments are described in general and discussed along with the potential for future developments and improvements.

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[2]  Catherine J. Grey The Cost of Oil Spills from Tankers: An Analysis of IOPC Fund Incidents , 1999 .

[3]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  A multi-layered risk exposure assessment approach for the shipping industry , 2014 .

[4]  Mark Reed,et al.  A natural resource damage assessment model for coastal and marine environments , 1988, GeoJournal.

[5]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and crossnational comparisons , 1994 .

[6]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection , 2010 .

[7]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Analysis of ship life cycles—The impact of economic cycles and ship inspections , 2009 .

[8]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Evaluation of safety and environmental risk at individual ship and company level , 2012 .

[9]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Evaluation of total risk exposure and insurance premiums in the maritime industry , 2017 .

[10]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Per Olaf Brett,et al.  Prevention of oil spill from shipping by modelling of dynamic risk. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[13]  Keith R. Hayes,et al.  Uncertainty and uncertainty analysis methods , 2011 .

[14]  Alexander M. Goulielmos,et al.  Treatment of uncompensated cost of marine accidents in a model of welfare economics , 1998 .

[15]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Assessing ecological sensitivities of marine assets to oil spill by means of expert knowledge , 2014 .

[16]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  The Econometrics of Maritime Safety: "Recommendations to Enhance Safety at Sea" , 2007 .

[17]  V. Eyring,et al.  Second IMO GHG study 2009 , 2009 .