Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade

Background Until now, several investigators have explored the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the preoperative tumor grading of endometrial cancer. However, the diagnostic value of DWI with quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been controversial. Purpose To explore the role of histogram analysis of ADC maps based on entire tumor volume in determining the grade of endometrial cancer. Material and Methods This study was IRB-approved with waiver of informed consent. Thirty-three patients with endometrial cancer underwent DWI (b = 0, 600, 1000 s/mm2), and corresponding ADC maps were acquired. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on all slices of the ADC map in which the tumor was visualized including areas of necrosis to derive volume-based histographic ADC data. Histogram parameters (5th–95th percentiles, mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) were correlated with histological grade using one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer test for post hoc comparisons, and were compared between high (grade 3) and low (grades 1/2) grade using Student t-test. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the optimum threshold value for each parameter, and their corresponding sensitivity and specificity. Results The standard deviation, quartile, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of ADC showed significant differences between grades (P ≤ 0.03 for all) and between high and low grades (P ≤ 0.024 for all). There were no significant correlations between tumor grade and other parameters. ROC curve analysis yielded sensitivities and specificities of 75% and 96%, 62.5% and 92%, 100% and 52%, 100% and 72%, and 100% and 88%, using standard deviation, quartile, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles for determining high grade with corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.787, 0.792, 0.765, 0.880, and 0.925, respectively. Conclusion Histogram analysis of ADC maps based on entire tumor volume can be useful for predicting the histological grade of endometrial cancer. The 90th and 95th percentiles of ADC were the most promising parameters for differentiating high from low grade.

[1]  Gordon Rustin,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  S. Galimberti,et al.  Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.

[4]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.

[5]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[6]  J A Blessing,et al.  Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer: Clinical—Pathologic Findings of a Prospective Study , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Shih-Ming Jung,et al.  Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging--initial experience. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  M. Köbel,et al.  High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes , 2010, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[9]  L. Lagasse,et al.  Prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Endometrial cancer , 2005, The Lancet.

[11]  Yingshi Sun,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[12]  N. Ramirez,et al.  Surgical Staging for Patients Presenting With Grade 1 Endometrial Carcinoma , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[14]  E. Kohn,et al.  A Gynecologic Oncology Group study of frequent copy number aberrations in DNA repair genes and other genomic regions in stage I serous ovarian cancers. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  D. Choi,et al.  Endometrial cancer: Utility of diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  R. Reznek,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of tumour grade in endometrial cancer. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  N. Maklad,et al.  The role of transvaginal sonography and endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of peri- and postmenopausal bleeding. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  P. Koper,et al.  Outcome of high-risk stage IC, grade 3, compared with stage I endometrial carcinoma patients: the Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. S. Kim,et al.  Differentiation of the various lesions causing an abnormality of the endometrial cavity using MR imaging: emphasis on enhancement patterns on dynamic studies and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  B. Goff,et al.  Assessment of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma. , 1990, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  E. Iglesias,et al.  Endometrial adenocarcinoma: prevention and early diagnosis. , 2008, Monographs in clinical cytology.

[22]  Seung Hong Choi,et al.  Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. , 2011, Radiology.

[23]  K. Chang,et al.  Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high B-value diffusion MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a correlation study with histological grade. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[24]  K. Togashi,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  A. Hongo,et al.  Measurement of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) of the primary tumor and CA125 are predictive of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  N. deSouza,et al.  Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  A. Hongo,et al.  The preoperative SUVmax is superior to ADCmin of the primary tumour as a predictor of disease recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.