Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions

As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems became significantly more prevalent in recent years, the concerns on how these systems collect, use and process big data also increased. To address these concerns and advocate for ethical and responsible development and implementation of AI, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), research centers, private companies, and governmental agencies published more than 100 AI ethics principles and guidelines. This first wave was followed by a series of suggested frameworks, tools, and checklists that attempt a technical fix to issues brought up in the high-level principles. Principles are important to create a common understanding for priorities and are the groundwork for future governance and opportunities for innovation. However, a review of these documents based on their country of origin and funding entities shows that private companies from US-West axis dominate the conversation. Several cases surfaced in the meantime which demonstrate biased algorithms and their impact on individuals and society. The field of AI ethics is urgently calling for tangible action to move from high-level abstractions and conceptual arguments towards applying ethics in practice and creating accountability mechanisms. However, lessons must be learned from the shortcomings of AI ethics principles to ensure the future investments, collaborations, standards, codes or legislation reflect the diversity of voices and incorporate the experiences of those who are already impacted by the biased algorithms.

[1]  Sasha Costanza-Chock,et al.  Design Justice , 2020 .

[2]  Andrew D. Selbst,et al.  Big Data's Disparate Impact , 2016 .

[3]  Arvind Narayanan,et al.  Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases , 2016, Science.

[4]  K. Lum,et al.  To predict and serve? , 2016 .

[5]  S. Noble Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism , 2018 .

[6]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  A global observatory for gene editing , 2018, Nature.

[7]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Toward inclusive tech policy design: a method for underrepresented voices to strengthen tech policy documents , 2019, Ethics and Information Technology.

[8]  Luke Stark,et al.  Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning , 2019, HICSS.

[9]  Corinne Cath Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Shoshana Zuboff The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2019 .

[11]  Paul Nemitz,et al.  Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Madhulika Srikumar,et al.  Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations , 2018, Minds and Machines.

[14]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  From What to How. An Overview of AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices , 2019, ArXiv.

[15]  Pratyusha Kalluri Don’t ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair, ask how it shifts power , 2020, Nature.

[16]  Frank A. Pasquale The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .

[17]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.

[18]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Shakir Mohamed,et al.  Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence , 2020, Philosophy & Technology.

[20]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical , 2019, Philosophy & Technology.

[21]  Elettra Bietti,et al.  From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy , 2019, FAT*.

[22]  Ruha Benjamin Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code , 2019, Social Forces.

[23]  M. Coeckelbergh,et al.  2 SUPERINTELLIGENCE, MONSTERS, AND THE AI APOCALYPSE , 2020 .

[24]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  A global observatory for gene editing. , 2018 .

[25]  Thilo Hagendorff,et al.  The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines , 2019, Minds and Machines.

[26]  M. Shanahan The Technological Singularity , 2015 .

[27]  Virginia E. Eubanks Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018 .

[28]  Marcello Ienca,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines , 2019, ArXiv.