The Validity of a Mixed Reality-Based Automated Functional Mobility Assessment

Functional mobility assessments (i.e., Timed Up and Go) are commonly used clinical tools for mobility and fall risk screening in older adults. In this work, we proposed a new Mixed Reality (MR)-based assessment that utilized a Microsoft HoloLensTM headset to automatically lead and track the performance of functional mobility tests, and subsequently evaluated its validity in comparison with reference inertial sensors. Twenty-two healthy adults (10 older and 12 young adults) participated in this study. An automated functional mobility assessment app was developed, based on the HoloLens platform. The mobility performance was recorded with the headset built-in sensor and reference inertial sensor (Opal, APDM) taped on the headset and lower back. The results indicate that the vertical kinematic measurements by HoloLens were in good agreement with the reference sensor (Normalized RMSE ~ 10%, except for cases where the inertial sensor drift correction was not viable). Additionally, the HoloLens-based test completion time was in perfect agreement with the clinical standard stopwatch measure. Overall, our preliminary investigation indicates that it is possible to use an MR headset to automatically guide users (without severe mobility deficit) to complete common mobility tests, and this approach has the potential to provide an objective and efficient sensor-based mobility assessment that does not require any direct research/clinical oversight.

[1]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Sit-to-Stand Test for Measuring Performance of Lower Extremity Muscles , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  Jacob J. Sosnoff,et al.  Smartphone technology can measure postural stability and discriminate fall risk in older adults. , 2019, Gait & posture.

[3]  Wendy A Rogers,et al.  A Fall Risk mHealth App for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study , 2018, JMIR aging.

[4]  L. Rubenstein Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[5]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  H. Menz,et al.  A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[8]  Mikel Izquierdo,et al.  Drift-Free Position Estimation for Periodic Movements Using Inertial Units , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[9]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Assessment of Postural Sway in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Using a Novel Wearable Inertial Sensor , 2018, Digital Biomarkers.

[10]  J. Stevens,et al.  Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults , 2018, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  M A Province,et al.  Frailty and Injuries in Later Life: The FICSIT Trials , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/british Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2022 .

[13]  Linda Denehy,et al.  Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[14]  Michael H Cole,et al.  Wearable technology reveals gait compensations, unstable walking patterns and fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[15]  W. Beam,et al.  A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[16]  G. Bergen,et al.  Falls and Fall Injuries Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years - United States, 2014. , 2016, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[17]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  The validity of assessing temporal events, sub-phases and trunk kinematics of the sit-to-walk movement in older adults using a single inertial sensor. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[19]  Preliminary evaluation of a self-guided fall risk assessment tool for older adults. , 2019, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[20]  Kelly J. Bower,et al.  Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Athanase Benetos,et al.  FIVE TIMES SIT TO STAND TEST IS A PREDICTOR OF RECURRENT FALLS IN HEALTHY COMMUNITY‐LIVING SUBJECTS AGED 65 AND OLDER , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  J. Sosnoff,et al.  Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review , 2018, BMC Geriatrics.

[23]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[24]  S. Lord,et al.  Kinect-Based Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test for Clinical and In-Home Assessment of Fall Risk in Older People , 2015, Gerontology.

[25]  Bernard C. Kress,et al.  11‐1: Invited Paper: Towards the Ultimate Mixed Reality Experience: HoloLens Display Architecture Choices , 2017 .

[26]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[27]  J. Kofman,et al.  Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Review: Are we stumbling in our quest to find the best predictor? Over-optimism in sensor-based models for predicting falls in older adults , 2015, Healthcare technology letters.