Measuring the mechanical properties of living cells using atomic force microscopy.

Mechanical properties of cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) play important roles in many biological processes including stem cell differentiation, tumor formation, and wound healing. Changes in stiffness of cells and ECM are often signs of changes in cell physiology or diseases in tissues. Hence, cell stiffness is an index to evaluate the status of cell cultures. Among the multitude of methods applied to measure the stiffness of cells and tissues, micro-indentation using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) provides a way to reliably measure the stiffness of living cells. This method has been widely applied to characterize the micro-scale stiffness for a variety of materials ranging from metal surfaces to soft biological tissues and cells. The basic principle of this method is to indent a cell with an AFM tip of selected geometry and measure the applied force from the bending of the AFM cantilever. Fitting the force-indentation curve to the Hertz model for the corresponding tip geometry can give quantitative measurements of material stiffness. This paper demonstrates the procedure to characterize the stiffness of living cells using AFM. Key steps including the process of AFM calibration, force-curve acquisition, and data analysis using a MATLAB routine are demonstrated. Limitations of this method are also discussed.

[1]  P. Janmey,et al.  A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[2]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  P. Janmey,et al.  Polymer physics of the cytoskeleton. , 2011, Current opinion in solid state & materials science.

[4]  T. Pollard,et al.  Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry , 1985 .

[5]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Brenton D. Hoffman,et al.  The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  M Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[8]  K. Costa,et al.  Non-Hertzian approach to analyzing mechanical properties of endothelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  James K Gimzewski,et al.  Green tea extract selectively targets nanomechanics of live metastatic cancer cells , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[10]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[11]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[12]  F. Byfield,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of substrate-attached cells to estimate cell stiffness. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[13]  E. Elson,et al.  Cellular mechanics as an indicator of cytoskeletal structure and function. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[14]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Ieee Xplore,et al.  IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society. , 2010 .

[17]  P K Hansma,et al.  Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[18]  W F Heinz,et al.  Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[20]  J. Crocker,et al.  Multiple-particle tracking and two-point microrheology in cells. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[21]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Gil U. Lee,et al.  Topography and nanomechanics of live neuronal growth cones analyzed by atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[23]  T C Lubensky,et al.  Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[24]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology probes length scale dependent rheology. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[25]  D. Stamopoulos,et al.  An atomic force microscopy study of Eurofer-97 steel , 2014 .

[26]  Joshua T. Davis,et al.  Muller cell expression of genes implicated in proliferative vitreoretinopathy is influenced by substrate elastic modulus. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  Soon-Mi Lim,et al.  Extracellular matrix effect on RhoA signaling modulation in vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[28]  D A Weitz,et al.  Filamin A is essential for active cell stiffening but not passive stiffening under external force. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Fei Liu,et al.  Micro-Mechanical Characterization of Lung Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[30]  C Rotsch,et al.  Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[31]  R. Lévy,et al.  Measuring the spring constant of atomic force microscope cantilevers: thermal fluctuations and other methods , 2002 .

[32]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[33]  P. Arratia,et al.  Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Andreea Trache,et al.  Live cell response to mechanical stimulation studied by integrated optical and atomic force microscopy. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[35]  Brenton D Hoffman,et al.  Cell mechanics: dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[36]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[37]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[38]  David C Lin,et al.  Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis--I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Influence of myosin II activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[40]  James K Gimzewski,et al.  AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[41]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[42]  R. Mahaffy,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[43]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton , 2006, Nature materials.

[44]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Tools to study cell mechanics and mechanotransduction. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[45]  Sebastian Rammensee,et al.  Softness, strength and self-repair in intermediate filament networks. , 2007, Experimental cell research.