Algorithms and selective attention

Selective attention is hypothesized to be controlled by intentionally chosen algorithms that specify how stimuli are to be processed. These experiments attempted to measure the time to select such algorithms. Subjects were given a two-choice reaction time task with a variety of different possible stimuli. Prior to each trial, subjects viewed a cue under their control that indicated the two possible stimuli for the upcoming trial. During this interval, subjects presumably selected a stimulus identification algorithm appropriate for that pair of letters; the duration of the interval was used as an index of algorithm selection time. The results indicated that selection time increases with the number of alternative algorithms and that algorithms may consist, in part, of perceptual tests to determine which of the two possible stimuli was presented. A specific model of the selection process was proposed to account for the results.

[1]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Shepard,et al.  The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  A. Treisman VERBAL CUES, LANGUAGE, AND MEANING IN SELECTIVE ATTENTION. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[6]  B. Forrin,et al.  Information processing behavior: the role of irrelevant stimulus information. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  P M FITTS,et al.  S-R COMPATIBILITY AND INFORMATION REDUCTION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Gray,et al.  Shorter Articles and Notes Grouping Strategies with Simultaneous Stimuli , 1960 .

[9]  N. Moray Beoadbent's Filter Theory: Postulate H and the Problem of Switching Time , 1960 .

[10]  D. Yntema,et al.  Recall as a search process , 1963 .

[11]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[12]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[13]  P Dixon,et al.  Numerical comparison processes , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[14]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[15]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  C. Penney Dichotic listening and sequential associations in auditory short-term memory. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Broadbent The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  A. Treisman,et al.  Shifting Attention between the Ears , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.