The Relationship between Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period

This study examined the relationship between attentional blink (AB) and psychological refractory period (PRP) using a conventional AB procedure combined with a requirement of speeded responses to the second target (T2). Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, as with PRP, memory retrieval of targets is not a necessary condition for the occurrence of AB in terms of accuracy and that AB occurred in the speed data. Experiment 3 further indicated that the PRP-like speed data were not due to the first target serving as a warning signal that triggered preparation of responses to T2. Experiment 4 manipulated T2 stimulus intensity to be normal or low. Results showed an underadditive interaction between stimulus intensity and lag position in the speed data, whereas an overadditive interaction was found in the accuracy data, suggesting 2 sources of interference leading to AB: the single-channel bottleneck and resource-limited visual-processing capacity.

[1]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[2]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[3]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[4]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[6]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[8]  Peter McLeod,et al.  Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period , 1977 .

[9]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[10]  R Schweickert,et al.  Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in a dual task. , 1980, Science.

[11]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[12]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search , 1983 .

[13]  D E Broadbent,et al.  Combining Attributes in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Tasks , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  R. Schweickert.  Latent network theory: scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  N. Kanwisher.  Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[16]  H. Pashler.  Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  H Pashler,et al.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[22]  M. Potter.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Ritske de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .

[24]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[26]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Determinants of repetition blindness. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  H Pashler,et al.  Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[33]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[37]  H. Egeth,et al.  Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[39]  W S Maki,et al.  Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: perceptual interference and retrieval competition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  B. Hommel,et al.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  P Langley,et al.  Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1997 .

[44]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  H. Pashler,et al.  When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[46]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[47]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[50]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink , 1999 .

[51]  James T. Enns,et al.  Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  T. Visser,et al.  Direct estimates of processing delays in the attentional blink , 2000, Psychological research.