Organisational transformation requires constructional knowledge of business systems

"Organizational transformation" is a term referring collectively to such activities as reengineering, redesigning and redefining business systems. The dominant enabling technology in transforming organizations is information and communication technology. The traditional knowledge regarding business systems, originating from such areas as business administration, management science and logistics, fails to provide the right understanding for the purpose of redesigning them. A promising new kind of understanding is brought forward by modeling approaches in the so-called language/action perspective. One of these approaches is known in the academic world, and for several years now in practice too, by the name DEMO (Dynamic Essential Modelling of Organisations). This paper presents and elaborates on one of the theoretical foundations of the DEMO methodology, namely its particular system concept and corresponding white-box model. These new notions provide a constructional understanding, as opposed to the traditional functional understanding, of business systems. It is shown in detail that such a constructional understanding, that is lacking in current methodologies, is a necessary precondition for successfully carrying out organizational transformation projects.

[1]  R. Belfield.  The process of innovation. , 1977, Science.

[2]  Fernando Flores,et al.  DOING AND SPEAKING IN THE OFFICE , 1980 .

[3]  V. E. Van Reijswoud,et al.  The structure of business communication : Theory, model and application , 1996 .

[4]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[5]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Completing the Loops , 1995 .

[6]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Modelling business processes for the purpose of redesign , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[7]  A. A. Jacobsen,et al.  Organisation of design , 1977 .

[8]  J.L.G. Dietz,et al.  Business modelling for business redesign , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems development and data modelling: conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1995 .

[10]  児玉 文雄.  Harvard Business Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[11]  Henry Mintzberg.  The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management , 1990 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[13]  M. Bunge.  Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[14]  Peter P. Chen.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[15]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[16]  M. Porter.  How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[17]  Linda Duxbury.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  On the success of speech acts and negotiating commitments , 1996 .

[19]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[20]  Peter G.W. Keen,et al.  Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology , 1991 .

[21]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[22]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[23]  Terry Winograd,et al.  The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[24]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[25]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[26]  R. Stamper.  Signs, Information, Norms and Systems , 1996 .

[27]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[28]  M. Porter.  The Contributions of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management , 1981 .

[29]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[30]  Glenford J. Myers,et al.  Structured Design , 1974, IBM Syst. J..

[31]  Mikael Lind,et al.  Reconstruction of Different Business Processes - A Theory and Method Driven Analysis , 1997 .

[32]  Victor van Reijswoud,et al.  Comparing speech act based modeling approaches for the purpose of IS development , 1995, ECIS.