A soft-contact and wrench based approach to study grasp planning and execution.

Grasping research in robotics has made remarkable progress in the last three decades and sophisticated computational tools are now available for planning robotic grasping in complex environments. However, studying the neural control of prehension in humans is more complex than studying robotic grasping. The elaborate musculoskeletal geometries and complex neural inputs to the hand facilitate a symphonic interplay of power and precision that allows humans to grasp fragile objects in a stable way without either crushing or dropping them. Most prehension studies have focused on a planar simplification of prehension since planar analyses render the complex problem of prehension tractable with few variables. The caveat is that planar simplification allows researchers to ask only a limited set of questions. In fact, one of the problems with extending prehension studies to three dimensions is the lack of analytical tools for quantifying features of spatial prehension. The current paper provides a theoretical adaptation and a step-by-step implementation of a widely used soft-contact wrench model for spatial human prehension. We propose two indices, grasp caliber and grasp intensity, to quantitatively relate digit placement and digit forces to grasp stability. Grasp caliber is the smallest singular value of the grasp matrix and it indicates the proximity of the current grasp configuration to instability. Grasp intensity is the magnitude of the excessive wrench applied by the digits to counter perturbations. Apart from quantifying stability of spatial grasps, these indices can also be applied to investigate sensory-motor coupling and the role of perception in grasp planning.

[1]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On the problem of decomposing grasp and manipulation forces in multiple whole-limb manipulation , 1994, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  M. Latash,et al.  Adaptations to fatigue of a single digit violate the principle of superposition in a multi-finger static prehension task , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Yanmei Li,et al.  A review of modeling of soft-contact fingers and stiffness control for dextrous manipulation in robotics , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[4]  D. Westwood,et al.  Grasping behavior in schizophrenia suggests selective impairment in the dorsal visual pathway. , 2008, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  T. Lejeune,et al.  Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Todd C. Pataky,et al.  Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, II: Modeling and optimization , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[9]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Maximo A. Roa,et al.  Evaluation of Human Prehension Using Grasp Quality Measures , 2012 .

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On the Closure Properties of Robotic Grasping , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[14]  Bernard Roth,et al.  Analysis of Multifingered Hands , 1986 .

[15]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Kinematics and control of multifingered hands with rolling contact , 1989 .

[16]  M Greig,et al.  Characterizing human hand prehensile strength by force and moment wrench , 2001, Ergonomics.

[17]  S. Gruber,et al.  Robot hands and the mechanics of manipulation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  J. Buitelaar,et al.  Grasping Motor Impairments in Autism: Not Action Planning but Movement Execution is Deficient , 2013, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[19]  Imin Kao,et al.  Modeling of Contact Mechanics and Friction Limit Surfaces for Soft Fingers in Robotics, with Experimental Results , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  Maurice A Smith,et al.  Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Suguru Arimoto Control Theory of Multi-fingered Hands: A Modelling and Analytical–Mechanics Approach for Dexterity and Intelligence , 2007 .

[23]  Hideki Hashimoto,et al.  Dextrous hand grasping force optimization , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[24]  Javaid Iqbal,et al.  On the Improvement of Multi-Legged Locomotion over Difficult Terrains Using a Balance Stabilization Method: , 2012 .

[25]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  On the stability of grasped objects , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[26]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Contact Sensing from Force Measurements , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Marco Santello,et al.  Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.