Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: a cross-cultural study.

Human beings are natural experts at processing faces, with some notable exceptions. Same-race faces are better recognized than other-race faces: the so-called other-race effect (ORE). Inverting faces impairs recognition more than for any other inverted visual object: the so-called face inversion effect (FIE). Interestingly, the FIE is stronger for same- compared to other-race faces. At the electrophysiological level, inverted faces elicit consistently delayed and often larger N170 compared to upright faces. However, whether the N170 component is sensitive to race is still a matter of ongoing debate. Here we investigated the N170 sensitivity to race in the framework of the FIE. We recorded EEG from Western Caucasian and East Asian observers while presented with Western Caucasian, East Asian and African American faces in upright and inverted orientations. To control for potential confounds in the EEG signal that might be evoked by the intrinsic and salient differences in the low-level properties of faces from different races, we normalized their amplitude-spectra, luminance and contrast. No differences on the N170 were observed for upright faces. Critically, inverted same-race faces lead to greater recognition impairment and elicited larger N170 amplitudes compared to inverted other-race faces. Our results indicate a finer-grained neural tuning for same-race faces at early stages of processing in both groups of observers.

[1]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces: Learning Effects with Mooney Faces , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  H. Abdi,et al.  Simulating the ‘Other-Race’ Effect with Autoassociative Neural Networks: Further Evidence in Favor of the Face-Space Model , 2006, Perception.

[3]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  B. Rossion,et al.  Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantage , 2004, Neuroreport.

[6]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[11]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  E. Ziegel Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[14]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  P. Sajda,et al.  Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  G. Mangun,et al.  Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[19]  R. Hess,et al.  What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? , 2002, Current Biology.

[20]  Rachael E. Jack,et al.  Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces , 2008, PloS one.

[21]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[22]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for “face-specific” EEG-potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  G. A. Feingold Influence of Environment on Identification of Persons and Things , 1914 .

[24]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[25]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[26]  Lucy S. Petro,et al.  Dynamics of Visual Information Integration in the Brain for Categorizing Facial Expressions , 2007, Current Biology.

[27]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 2005 .

[29]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Marie L. Smith,et al.  From a face to its category via a few information processing states in the brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[32]  C. Joyce,et al.  The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[34]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[35]  B Renault,et al.  Face versus non-face object perception and the ‘other-race’ effect: a spatio-temporal event-related potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[37]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Tracking the Timecourse of Social Perception: The Effects of Racial Cues on Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[40]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[41]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[42]  J SWETS,et al.  Decision processes in perception. , 1961, Psychological review.

[43]  T. Ito,et al.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[46]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[47]  A. Nobre,et al.  Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[48]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[49]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Memory in everyday life , 1993 .

[50]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[51]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[52]  A. W. Carroo,et al.  Other Race Recognition: A Comparison of Black American and African Subjects , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[53]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[54]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[55]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  Michael L. Peterson,et al.  Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355) , 2006 .

[57]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[58]  Roberto Caldara,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[59]  James W Tanaka,et al.  An Encoding Advantage for Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2003, Perception.

[60]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[61]  D. Jeffreys Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[62]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[63]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  When Is a Face Not a Face? The Effects of Misorientation on Mechanisms of Face Perception , 2003 .

[64]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[65]  C. Husbands Race and Gender , 1988 .

[66]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[67]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[68]  D. Levin CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[69]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[70]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[71]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence , 2007, Vision Research.

[72]  D. Jeffreys A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  M. Herrmann,et al.  The other-race effect for face perception: an event-related potential study , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[74]  B. Renault,et al.  ERPs and chronometry of face recognition: following‐up Seeck et al. and George et al. , 1998, Neuroreport.