Nanog, Oct4 and Tet1 interplay in establishing pluripotency

A few central transcription factors inside mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are believed to control the cells’ pluripotency. Characterizations of pluripotent state were put forward on both transcription factor and epigenetic levels. Whereas core players have been identified, it is desirable to map out gene regulatory networks which govern the reprogramming of somatic cells as well as the early developmental decisions. Here we propose a multiple level model where the regulatory network of Oct4, Nanog and Tet1 includes positive feedback loops involving DNA-demethylation around the promoters of Oct4 and Tet1. We put forward a mechanistic understanding of the regulatory dynamics which account for i) Oct4 overexpression is sufficient to induce pluripotency in somatic cell types expressing the other Yamanaka reprogramming factors endogenously; ii) Tet1 can replace Oct4 in reprogramming cocktail; iii) Nanog is not necessary for reprogramming however its over-expression leads to enhanced self-renewal; iv) DNA methylation is the key to the regulation of pluripotency genes; v) Lif withdrawal leads to loss of pluripotency. Overall, our paper proposes a novel framework combining transcription regulation with DNA methylation modifications which, takes into account the multi-layer nature of regulatory mechanisms governing pluripotency acquisition through reprogramming.

[1]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[2]  Wing H Wong,et al.  An Oct4-Sall4-Nanog network controls developmental progression in the pre-implantation mouse embryo , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[4]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[5]  Austin G Smith Nanog Heterogeneity: Tilting at Windmills? , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[6]  A. Jeltsch,et al.  New concepts in DNA methylation. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  J. Nichols,et al.  Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[8]  John K. Heath,et al.  Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides , 1988, Nature.

[9]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  Gradual DNA demethylation of the Oct4 promoter in cloned mouse embryos , 2006, Molecular reproduction and development.

[10]  J. Wrana,et al.  Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[11]  A. Radzisheuskaya,et al.  Do all roads lead to Oct4? The emerging concepts of induced pluripotency , 2014, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  Austin G Smith,et al.  The ground state of pluripotency. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[13]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[14]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Stoichiometric and temporal requirements of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc expression for efficient human iPSC induction and differentiation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[16]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .

[17]  Ava C. Carter,et al.  Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[18]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Probing the role of stochasticity in a model of the embryonic stem cell – heterogeneous gene expression and reprogramming efficiency , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  Chuan He,et al.  HMGA2/TET1/HOXA9 signaling pathway regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Apoorva Mandavilli,et al.  Of mice and men , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[21]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Collaboration between CpG sites is needed for stable somatic inheritance of DNA methylation states , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  F. Claessens,et al.  Dynamic Switching of Active Promoter and Enhancer Domains Regulates Tet1 and Tet2 Expression during Cell State Transitions between Pluripotency and Differentiation , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  Ori Bar-Nur,et al.  Nanog Is Dispensable for the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2014, Current Biology.

[24]  Shulan Tian,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[25]  D. Page,et al.  Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[26]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Oct4-Induced Pluripotency in Adult Neural Stem Cells , 2009, Cell.

[27]  Tristan Frum,et al.  Oct4 cell-autonomously promotes primitive endoderm development in the mouse blastocyst. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[28]  Ian Chambers,et al.  Transcription factor heterogeneity and epiblast pluripotency , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[30]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.

[31]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[32]  C. Kedinger,et al.  A p38 inhibitor allows to dissociate differentiation and apoptotic processes triggered upon LIF withdrawal in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2004, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[33]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  DNA methylation in human epigenomes depends on local topology of CpG sites , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  K. Horimoto,et al.  Optimal Ratio of Transcription Factors for Somatic Cell Reprogramming* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[38]  M. Maurin,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00633.x The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling , 2008 .

[39]  J. Nichols,et al.  BMP Induction of Id Proteins Suppresses Differentiation and Sustains Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Collaboration with STAT3 , 2003, Cell.

[40]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Epigenetic Cell Memory by Nucleosome Modification , 2007, Cell.

[41]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[42]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[43]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine distribution reveals its dual function in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Genes & development.

[44]  W. Reik,et al.  Nanog-dependent function of Tet1 and Tet2 in establishment of pluripotency , 2013, Nature.

[45]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Molecular cell.

[46]  H. Ng,et al.  Reduced Oct4 Expression Directs a Robust Pluripotent State with Distinct Signaling Activity and Increased Enhancer Occupancy by Oct4 and Nanog , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[47]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  A defined Oct4 level governs cell state transitions of pluripotency entry and differentiation into all embryonic lineages , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[48]  Xi Chen,et al.  Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Genes & development.

[49]  Wing H Wong,et al.  An Oct 4-Sall 4-Nanog network controls developmental progression in the preimplantation mouse embryo , 2013 .

[50]  Dominique Chu,et al.  Models of transcription factor binding: sensitivity of activation functions to model assumptions. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[52]  A. Bird,et al.  CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. , 2011, Genes & development.

[53]  T. Cai,et al.  Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[54]  Richard A Young,et al.  Control of the Embryonic Stem Cell State , 2011, Cell.

[55]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[56]  David R. Liu,et al.  Conversion of 5-Methylcytosine to 5- Hydroxymethylcytosine in Mammalian DNA by the MLL Partner TET1 , 2009 .

[57]  Dung-Fang Lee,et al.  Single Transcription Factor Reprogramming of Hair Follicle Dermal Papilla Cells to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2011, Stem cells.

[58]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Differentiation of developing olfactory neurons analysed in terms of coupled epigenetic landscapes , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[59]  G. Martin,et al.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[61]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[62]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity , 2011, Nature.

[63]  N. Corbi,et al.  Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. , 1995, Genes & development.

[64]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  OCT4 establishes and maintains nucleosome-depleted regions that provide additional layers of epigenetic regulation of its target genes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  A. Smith,et al.  Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[66]  Hao Wu,et al.  Reversing DNA Methylation: Mechanisms, Genomics, and Biological Functions , 2014, Cell.

[67]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Reprogramming of Trophoblast Stem Cells into Pluripotent Stem Cells by Oct4 , 2011, Stem cells.

[68]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[69]  Jialiang Liang,et al.  A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[70]  K. Helin,et al.  DNA methylation: TET proteins—guardians of CpG islands? , 2012, EMBO reports.