Troubled waters: an institutional analysis of ageing Dutch and American waterway infrastructure

Waterways are one of the oldest systems for the transportation of cargo and continue to play a vital role in the economies of some countries. Due to societal change, climate change and the ageing of assets, the conditions influencing the effective functioning of these systems seem to be changing. These changing conditions require measures to renew, adapt or renovate these waterway systems. However, measures with the sole aim of improving navigation conditions have encountered resistance, as the general public, and stakeholders in particular, value these waters in many more ways than navigation alone. Therefore, a more inclusive, integrated approach is required, rather than a sectoral one. Addressing these contemporary challenges requires a shift in the traditional waterway authorities' regimes. The aim of this study is to identify elements in the institutional setting where obstacles and opportunities for a more inclusive approach can be found. Two major waterway systems, the American and the Dutch, have been analyzed using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework to reveal those obstacles and opportunities. The results show that horizontal coordination and a low pay-off for an inclusive approach is particularly problematic. The American case also reveals a promising aspect – mandatory local co-funding for federal navigation projects acts as a stimulus for broad stakeholder involvement. Improving horizontal coordination and seizing opportunities for multifunctional development can open pathways to optimize the value of waterway systems for society.

[1]  Thomas Risse-Kappen Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union , 1996 .

[2]  Ian Bache,et al.  Themes and Issues in Multi-level Governance , 2004 .

[3]  John M. Bryson,et al.  A Contingent Approach to Strategy and Tactics in Project Planning , 1979 .

[4]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Modal-split effects of climate change: The effects of low water levels on the competitive position of inland waterway transport in the River Rhine area , 2011 .

[5]  J. Bryson What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[6]  Alex T. Bielak,et al.  Deep Words, Shallow Words: An Initial Analysis of Water Discourse in Four Decades of UN Declarations , 2011 .

[7]  Sander Lenferink,et al.  Towards sustainable infrastructure development through integrated contracts: Experiences with inclusiveness in Dutch infrastructure projects , 2013 .

[8]  R. Goodin,et al.  The Oxford handbook of public policy , 2008 .

[9]  D. North,et al.  Economic performance through time , 2012 .

[10]  Hubert H. Humphrey,et al.  REPRESENTATION, TESTING AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF PLANNING PROCESSES , 2005 .

[11]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Working Paper 5219 Equilibrium Fictions A Cognitive Approach to Societal Rigidity , 2010 .

[12]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Policy Network Analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Bart Jourquin,et al.  Climate change impacts on transport on the Rhine and Danube: A multimodal approach , 2014 .

[14]  Andreas Kopp,et al.  Transport infrastructure: Investment and planning. Policy and research aspects , 2005 .

[15]  P. Hawkes,et al.  Climate change and navigation : waterborne transport, ports and waterways: a review of climate change drivers, impacts responses and mitigation , 2010 .

[16]  Sabyasachee Mishra,et al.  Multi Entity Perspective Transportation Infrastructure Investment Decision Making , 2013 .

[17]  Ariel Dinar,et al.  The institutional economics of water , 2004 .

[18]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[19]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins , 2012 .

[20]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[21]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice , 2011 .

[22]  John M. Bryson,et al.  What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques , 2003 .

[23]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[24]  E. Ostrom,et al.  A Grammar of Institutions , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[25]  G. Marsden,et al.  Muddling through with climate change targets: a multi-level governance perspective on the transport sector , 2014 .

[26]  Johan Woltjer,et al.  Do We Need to Rethink Our Waterways? Values of Ageing Waterways in Current and Future Society , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[27]  E. Ostrom Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.