Online participation in climate change adaptation: A case study of agricultural adaptation measures in Northern Italy.

The new EU strategy on adaptation to climate change suggests flexible and participatory approaches. Face-to-face contact, although it involves time-consuming procedures with a limited audience, has often been considered the most effective participatory approach. In recent years, however, there has been an increase in the visibility of different citizens' initiatives in the online world, which strengthens the possibility of greater citizen agency. This paper investigates whether the Internet can ensure efficient public participation with meaningful engagement in climate change adaptation. In elucidating issues regarding climate change adaptation, we developed an eParticipation framework to explore adaptation capacity of agriculture to climate change in Northern Italy. Farmers were mobilised using a pre-existing online network. First they took part in an online questionnaire for revealing their perceptions of and reactions to the impacts of ongoing changes in agriculture. We used these results to suggest a portfolio of policy measures and to set evaluation criteria. Farmers then evaluated these policy options, using a multi criteria analysis tool with a simple user-friendly interface. Our results showed that eParticipation is efficient: it supports a rapid data collection, while involving high number of participants. Moreover, we demonstrated that the digital divide is decreasingly an obstacle for using online spaces for public engagement. This research does not present eParticipation as a panacea. Rather, eParticipation was implemented with well-established participatory approaches to both validate the results and, consequently, communicate meaningful messages on local agricultural adaptation practices to regional decision-makers. Feedbacks from the regional decision-makers showed their interest in using eParticipation to improve communication with farmers in the future. We expect that, with further Internet proliferation, eParticipation may allow the inclusion of more representative samples, which would contribute to an informed and legitimate decision-making process.

[1]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.

[2]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Expanding the table: the web as a tool for participatory adaptive management in California forests. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[4]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[5]  Emily Boyd,et al.  Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society , 2010 .

[6]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[7]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Agricultural policy informed by farmers’ adaptation experience to climate change in Veneto, Italy , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[8]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  eParticipation: The Research Gaps , 2009, ePart.

[9]  G. Munda Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies , 2006 .

[10]  J. Simos,et al.  Evaluer l"impact sur l"environnement , 1990 .

[11]  G. Owen,et al.  Thirteen theorems in search of the truth , 1983 .

[12]  De Li Liu,et al.  Adapting agriculture to climate change: a review , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[13]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Andrea Cornwall Beneficiary consumer citizen: perspectives on participation for poverty reduction , 2000 .

[15]  M. Bindi,et al.  The responses of agriculture in Europe to climate change , 2011 .

[16]  Martin Rogers,et al.  Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Greg Lyle,et al.  Understanding the nested, multi-scale, spatial and hierarchical nature of future climate change adaptation decision making in agricultural regions: A narrative literature review , 2015 .

[18]  Mark Lubell,et al.  How limiting factors drive agricultural adaptation to climate change , 2015 .

[19]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[20]  D. Warburton,et al.  The True Costs of Public Participation , 2007 .

[21]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[23]  R. Adams,et al.  Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review , 1998 .

[24]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[25]  C. Giupponi,et al.  Drivers of Change in Southern European Agriculture: Online Participatory Approaches for the Analysis of Planned and Autonomous Adaptation Strategies , 2012 .

[26]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Citizens4Citizens: mapping participatory practices on the internet , 2009 .

[27]  J. Millard European eParticipation Summary Report , 2009 .

[28]  Marc Hooghe,et al.  The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts , 2010 .

[29]  Elisa Vargas-Amelin,et al.  The challenge of climate change in Spain: Water resources, agriculture and land , 2014 .

[30]  David C. Howell,et al.  Unidimensional Scaling , 2004 .

[31]  María Rosalía Vicente,et al.  An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens' online engagement , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  M. Trnka,et al.  Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change , 2011 .

[34]  Jakob Linaa Jensen,et al.  Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[35]  M. Castells,et al.  The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy , 2006 .

[36]  Tania López-Marrero An integrative approach to study and promote natural hazards adaptive capacity: a case study of two flood‐prone communities in Puerto Rico , 2010 .

[37]  S. Hajkowicz Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  A. Meijer,et al.  YOUNG PEOPLE, THE INTERNET AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION , 2009 .

[39]  W. Olsen,et al.  Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed , 2004 .

[40]  Pierre-Alain Jayet,et al.  Farm-level Autonomous Adaptation of European Agricultural Supply to Climate Change , 2013 .

[41]  R. C. Abeyaratne,et al.  A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos' procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[42]  H. P. Young,et al.  An axiomatization of Borda's rule , 1974 .

[43]  David W. Pickton,et al.  What's swot in strategic analysis? , 1998 .

[44]  M. Hare,et al.  Forms of Participatory Modelling and its Potential for Widespread Adoption in the Water Sector , 2011 .

[45]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Decision Support Systems for implementing the European Water Framework Directive: The MULINO approach , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  M. Parlange,et al.  A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Julie Ingram,et al.  Triggering change: towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision-making. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Network Analysis, Creative System Modelling and Decision Support: The Netsymod Approach , 2006 .

[49]  G. Fischer,et al.  Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios , 2004 .

[50]  Ralf Wieland,et al.  LandCaRe DSS--an interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[51]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[52]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  N. Denzin The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1970 .

[54]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[55]  R. Leemans,et al.  Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: The importance of farm level responses , 2010 .

[56]  B. Bravo‐Ureta,et al.  Farm level adaptation decisions to face climatic change and variability: Evidence from Central Chile , 2014 .

[57]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[58]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The Role of Social Networking Services in eParticipation , 2009, ePart.

[59]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[60]  Elena Sánchez-Nielsen,et al.  eParticipation in Practice in Europe: The Case of "Puzzled by Policy: Helping You Be Part of EU" , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[61]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives , 2008, CACM.