Uncertainty in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning boosts learning of images in women but not men.

A key tenet of models of reinforcement learning is that learning is most desirable in the times of maximum uncertainty. Here we examine the role of uncertainty in the paradigm of fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning (fast-TIPL), where stimuli that are consistently presented at relevant points in times (e.g., with task targets or rewards) are better encoded than when presented at other times. We manipulated two forms of uncertainty, expected uncertainty and unexpected uncertainty (Yu & Dayan, 2005), and compared fast-TIPL under uncertainty with fast-TIPL under no uncertainty. Results indicate a larger fast-TIPL effect under uncertainty than under no uncertainty without a difference between expected and unexpected uncertainty. However, interestingly, this effect of uncertainty on fast-TIPL was found in women but not in men. In men, equivalent fast-TIPL was observed under no uncertainty and uncertainty, whereas in women, confirming previous results (Leclercq & Seitz, 2012b), no fast-TIPL was observed in the no-uncertainty condition, but fast-TIPL was observed in the uncertainty conditions. We discuss how these results imply differences in attention or neuromodulatory processes between men and women.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Enhancement from targets and suppression from cues in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .

[4]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  The role of timing in the attentional boost effect , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. , 1998, Science.

[6]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning is disrupted by sudden onset of central task elements , 2012, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Dolan,et al.  Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain , 2008, Neuron.

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  B. Sherwin,et al.  Variations in memory function and sex steroid hormones across the menstrual cycle , 1992, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[10]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[11]  Scott Sinnett,et al.  Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Michael P. Kilgard,et al.  Order-sensitive plasticity in adult primary auditory cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant? , 2008, PloS one.

[14]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning , 2009, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[16]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A unified model for perceptual learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Fast-TIPL Occurs for Salient Images without a Memorization Requirement in Men but Not in Women , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Low-level sensory plasticity during task-irrelevant perceptual learning: Evidence from conventional and double training procedures , 2010, Vision Research.

[21]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Requirement for high-level processing in subliminal learning , 2005, Current Biology.

[22]  Donald A. Wilson,et al.  Acetylcholine and olfactory perceptual learning. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[23]  L. Cahill Why sex matters for neuroscience , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task , 2010, Cognition.

[26]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[27]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Enhanced Memory for Scenes Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Points in Time , 2010, PLoS biology.

[28]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[29]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning without perception , 2001, Nature.

[30]  W. Singer,et al.  Modulation of visual cortical plasticity by acetylcholine and noradrenaline , 1986, Nature.

[31]  José E. Náñez,et al.  Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Encoding of episodic information through fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning , 2014, Vision Research.

[33]  M. Silver,et al.  Cholinergic Enhancement Augments Magnitude and Specificity of Visual Perceptual Learning in Healthy Humans , 2010, Current Biology.