Toward Refocused Optical Mouse Sensors for Outdoor Optical Flow Odometry

This paper investigates the use of refocused optical mouse sensors for odometry in the field of outdoor robotic navigation. Optical mouse sensors like the ADNS-2610 are small, inexpensive, non-contact devices, which integrate a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor camera and DSP hardware to provide 2-D optical displacement measurements. Current research indicates that vertical height variance contributes as a dominant cause of systematic error to horizontal displacement measurements, which raises significant problems for irregular environments encountered in outdoor robotic navigation. In this paper, we propose two approaches to mitigate this systematic error induced by height variance. The efficacy and robustness of the proposed approaches are tested by experimentation on an asphalt concrete road surface and by simulation.

[1]  Weiliang Xu,et al.  Visual dead-reckoning for motion control of a Mecanum-wheeled mobile robot , 2004 .

[2]  Galen Brambley,et al.  Dual Optic-flow Integrated Inertial Navigation , 2007 .

[3]  Rosemary Norman,et al.  Investigations into the effects of illumination and acceleration on optical mouse sensors as contact-free 2D measurement devices , 2009 .

[4]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Mobile robot positioning: Sensors and techniques , 1997, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  Thomas Thüer,et al.  Mobility evaluation of wheeled all-terrain robots , 2009 .

[6]  Jing Li,et al.  GPS accuracy estimation using map matching techniques: Applied to vehicle positioning and odometer calibration , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  John Devlin,et al.  Analysis of real-time velocity compensation for outdoor optical mouse sensor odometry , 2010, 2010 11th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision.

[8]  Jwu-Sheng Hu,et al.  Calibration and on-line data selection of multiple optical flow sensors for odometry applications , 2009 .

[9]  T. W. Ng The optical mouse as a two-dimensional displacement sensor , 2003 .

[10]  Sooyong Lee Mobile robot localization using optical mice , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, 2004..

[11]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Path Planning for Planetary Exploration Rovers and Its Evaluation based on Wheel Slip Dynamics , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Where am I?" sensors and methods for mobile robot positioning , 1996 .

[13]  Guangjun Liu,et al.  Modeling of tracked mobile manipulators with consideration of track-terrain and vehicle-manipulator interactions , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  Umberto Minoni,et al.  Low-cost optical motion sensors: An experimental characterization , 2006 .

[15]  Dale W. Callahan,et al.  A Rationale for the use of Optical Mice Chips for Economic and Accurate Vehicle Tracking , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[16]  Andrea Bonarini,et al.  Automatic Error Detection and Reduction for an Odometric Sensor based on Two Optical Mice , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Jordi Palacín,et al.  The optical mouse for indoor mobile robot odometry measurement , 2006 .

[18]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  Self-localization for indoor mobile robots based on optical mouse sensor values and simple global camera information , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics - ROBIO.

[19]  Andrea Bonarini,et al.  A kinematic-independent dead-reckoning sensor for indoor mobile robotics , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[20]  M. Wing,et al.  Consumer-Grade Global Positioning System (GPS) Accuracy and Reliability , 2005 .