Investigation of the forward kinematics of the Gough‐Stewart manipulator with natural coordinates

In this paper, we propose a forward kinematics model with natural coordinates for the Gough–Stewart manipulator and other spatial parallel mechanisms. The prevailing merits of this model are that the constraint equations are either quadratic or linear and the coordinates are fully Cartesian. As a result, the derivative matrix of the constraint equations only consists of linear or constant elements, which shows remarkable advantages in kinematic and dynamic analysis over those built through the rotation matrix, the elements of which often contain quadratic or transcendental functions. Application examples show that the virtues are obvious in the analysis of the kinematics of spatial parallel manipulators, especially for those with six full degrees of freedom (DoFs), including three translational DoFs and three rotational DoFs. In reality, this method is easily understood and will be widely used in engineering applications.

[1]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  Position kinematics of a two limbed mixed mechanism , 1993 .

[2]  C. Gosselin,et al.  The direct kinematics of planar parallel manipulators: Special architectures and number of solutions , 1994 .

[3]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems , 1994 .

[4]  E F Fichter,et al.  A Stewart Platform- Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction , 1986 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Merlet Forward Kinematics of Nonpolyhedral Parallel Manipulators , 1993 .

[6]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  Series-Parallel Dualities in Actively Coordinated Mechanisms , 1988, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Lung-Wen Tsai,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of 3-DOF Position Mechanisms for Use in Hybrid Kinematic Machines , 2002 .

[8]  Reinhold von Schwerin MultiBody System SIMulation - Numerical Methods, Algorithms, and Software , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[9]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real Time Challenge , 1994 .

[10]  John E. McInroy,et al.  Orthogonal Gough-Stewart platforms for micromanipulation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Solving the Forward Kinematics of a Gough-Type Parallel Manipulator with Interval Analysis , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[13]  Tadeusz Szkodny Dynamics of industrial robot manipulators , 1995 .

[14]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Instantaneous Kinematics of General Hybrid Parallel Manipulators , 1995 .

[15]  Oscar Altuzarra,et al.  Kinematic analysis of mechanisms via a velocity equation based in a geometric matrix , 2003 .

[16]  T. Szkodny Forward and inverse kinematics of IRb-6 manipulator , 1995 .

[17]  Marco Ceccarelli,et al.  Dynamic performance of CaPaMan by numerical simulations , 2002 .

[18]  Kai Zhou,et al.  A new method to study the degree of freedom of spatial parallel mechanisms , 2004 .

[19]  V. Cossalter,et al.  On the use of natural coordinates in optimal synthesis of mechanisms , 2000 .

[20]  Karol Miller,et al.  Optimal Design and Modeling of Spatial Parallel Manipulators , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..