Observations of particle density and scattering in the Tamar Estuary.

Abstract To investigate the relationships between the optical scattering and the physical properties of suspended sediments such as size and density, the absorption and scattering coefficients ( a and b ), mass concentration and particle size spectra have been measured at 30 stations along a transect of the Tamar Estuary and Plymouth Sound. The apparent density of the suspended sediment ( ρ a ), which dropped significantly in the upper reaches of the estuary, was found to vary negatively as a function of both the chlorophyll concentration and median particle size by volume ( D v ). A relationship of the form, ρ i = (ρ p /D p −α ) D i −α relating the density of individual particle size fractions ( ρ i ) of diameter D i has been assumed and used to predict the total apparent density of the size spectrum. By comparing this to the measured apparent density, the size and density of the primary particles ( D p and ρ p ) and value of α (a measure of the fractal dimension) which in combination produce the best fit of predicted to actual ρ have been found. They were found to be 3.9 μm, 1787 kg m – 3 and 0.65, respectively. These values were closely reproduced by repeating this method for the specific scattering coefficient ( b* ) which was determined by applying Mie theory to the measured particle size spectra for a refractive index consistent with that used by the LISST instrument. Using the calculated values of D p and ρ p the best fit value for the fractal dimension was determined for each station. The fractal dimension is shown to be strongly correlated with the apparent density and varies significantly from 2.05 in turbid, chlorophyll-rich Tamar water to 2.56 in the clearer water out in Plymouth Sound. Results suggest that the relationship between fractal dimension and particle density is robust and can be used to predict primary particle size and density from bulk properties. Until now these values, which are important for aggregation models have not been easily determined.

[1]  G. Basterretxea,et al.  High-resolution spatio-temporal distribution of a coastal phytoplankton bloom using laser in situ scattering and transmissometry (LISST) , 2008 .

[2]  Amanda L. Whitmire,et al.  Light scattering by random shaped particles and consequences on measuring suspended sediments by laser diffraction , 2008 .

[3]  L. Prieur,et al.  Absorption by dissolved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) in the UV and visible domains1 , 1981 .

[4]  A. J. Bale,et al.  Aggregation and resuspension of suspended particulate matter at a seasonally stratified site in the southern North Sea: physical and biological controls , 1998 .

[5]  M. L. Barton,et al.  Bulk properties of intertidal sediments in a muddy, macrotidal estuary , 1992 .

[6]  A. Elliott,et al.  Suspended sediment concentrations in the Tamar estuary , 2003 .

[7]  M. Fettweis.  Uncertainty of excess density and settling velocity of mud flocs derived from in situ measurements , 2008 .

[8]  C. Kranenburg.  The Fractal Structure of Cohesive Sediment Aggregates , 1994 .

[9]  Johan C. Winterwerp,et al.  A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of cohesive sediment , 1998 .

[10]  H. Hoppe.  Attachment of Bacteria: Advantage or Disadvantage for Survival in the Aquatic Environment , 1984 .

[11]  Y. C. Agrawal,et al.  Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport , 2000 .

[12]  M. White,et al.  Turbidity in the southern Irish Sea , 2002 .

[13]  James D. Irish,et al.  A laboratory evaluation of the laser in situ scattering and transmissometery instrument using natural sediments , 1999 .

[14]  Paul S. Hill,et al.  Settling velocity, effective density, and mass composition of suspended sediment in a coastal bottom boundary layer, Gulf of Lions, France , 2007 .

[15]  S. Boudjelas,et al.  The distribution of fine suspended sediments in the surface waters of the Irish Sea and its relation to tidal stirring , 1998 .

[16]  Lee Karp-Boss,et al.  LISST‐100 measurements of phytoplankton size distribution: evaluation of the effects of cell shape , 2007 .

[17]  R. Uncles,et al.  Distributions of suspended sediment at high water in a macrotidal estuary , 1989 .

[18]  C. Binding,et al.  The optical properties of mineral suspended particles: A review and synthesis , 2006 .

[19]  M. Pejrup,et al.  The use of a LISST-100 laser particle sizer for in-situ estimates of floc size, density and settling velocity , 2001 .

[20]  D. Huntley,et al.  Measurement of the influence of salinity on floc density and strength , 1991 .

[21]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  Light scattering properties of marine particles in coastal and open ocean waters as related to the particle mass concentration , 2003 .

[22]  J. Simpson,et al.  The measurement of suspended particulate concentrations from remotely-sensed data , 1991 .

[23]  K. Dyer,et al.  A laboratory examination of floc characteristics with regard to turbulent shearing , 1999 .

[24]  R. Marin,et al.  Mapping phytoplankton in situ using a laser‐scattering sensor , 2008 .

[25]  W. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  Light scattering by particles suspended in the sea: The role of particle size and density , 2009 .