Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems

Summary 1. Significant advances in both mathematical and molecular approaches in ecology offer unprecedented opportunities to describe and understand ecosystem functioning. Ecological networks describe interactions between species, the underlying structure of communities and the function and stability of ecosystems. They provide the ability to assess the robustness of complex ecological communities to species loss, as well as a novel way of guiding restoration. However, empirically quantifying the interactions between entire communities remains a significant challenge. 2. Concomitantly, advances in DNA sequencing technologies are resolving previously intractable questions in functional and taxonomic biodiversity and provide enormous potential to determine hitherto difficult to observe species interactions. Combining DNA metabarcoding approaches with ecological network analysis presents important new opportunities for understanding large-scale ecological and evolutionary processes, as well as providing powerful tools for building ecosystems that are resilient to environmental change. 3. We propose a novel ‘nested tagging’ metabarcoding approach for the rapid construction of large, phylogenetically structured species-interaction networks. Taking tree–insect–parasitoid ecological networks as an illustration, we show how measures of network robustness, constructed using DNA metabarcoding, can be used to determine the consequences of tree species loss within forests, and forest habitat loss within wider landscapes. By determining which species and habitats are important to network integrity, we propose new directions for forest management. 4. Merging metabarcoding with ecological network analysis provides a revolutionary opportunity to construct some of the largest, phylogenetically structured species-interaction networks to date, providing new ways to: (i) monitor biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; (ii) assess the robustness of interacting communities to species loss; and (iii) build ecosystems that are more resilient to environmental change.

[1]  Sonia Kéfi,et al.  More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[2]  Alireza Tamaddoni-Nezhad,et al.  Learning ecological networks from next-generation sequencing data , 2016 .

[3]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  G. Pētersons,et al.  Diet of the insectivorous bat Pipistrellus nathusii during autumn migration and summer residence , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[6]  Thierry Vermat,et al.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[9]  Miguel G. Matias,et al.  Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  David H. Lunt,et al.  Determining Plant – Leaf Miner – Parasitoid Interactions: A DNA Barcoding Approach , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Evolution and Coevolution in Mutualistic Networks , 2022 .

[12]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks : beyond food webs Ecological networks – beyond food webs , 2008 .

[13]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trn L (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Marianne Elias,et al.  Evolutionary History and Ecological Processes Shape a Local Multilevel Antagonistic Network , 2013, Current Biology.

[15]  Mário Almeida-Neto,et al.  A simple stochastic model for complex coextinctions in mutualistic networks: robustness decreases with connectance. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[16]  J. Memmott,et al.  The restoration of tropical seed dispersal networks , 2015 .

[17]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[18]  Si Tang,et al.  Secondary extinctions in food webs: a Bayesian network approach , 2013 .

[19]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Owen T Lewis,et al.  Structural dynamics and robustness of food webs. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[21]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  David B. Roy,et al.  Revealing the foundations of biodiversity: The Database of British Insects and their Foodplants , 2008 .

[23]  G. Bonan Forests and Global Change , 2011 .

[24]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[25]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS OF FOOD-WEB MATRICES , 2002 .

[26]  N. Loeuille,et al.  Relative impacts of environmental variation and evolutionary history on the nestedness and modularity of tree–herbivore networks , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[27]  Kazuto Nakada,et al.  A General Model for Food Web Structure , 2008 .

[28]  G. Kerr,et al.  Ash dieback in the UK: A review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options , 2014 .

[29]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[30]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: The example of plant–pollinator networks , 2010 .

[31]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[32]  J Memmott,et al.  The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[33]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The temporal dynamics of resource use by frugivorous birds: a network approach. , 2009, Ecology.

[34]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Multiplex reactions for the molecular detection of predation on pest and nonpest invertebrates in agroecosystems , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[35]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[36]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs , 2007, Nature.

[37]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[38]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Jan Hrček,et al.  What do molecular methods bring to host-parasitoid food webs? , 2015, Trends in parasitology.

[40]  M. Cristescu,et al.  From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities , 2004 .

[42]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Success and its limits among structural models of complex food webs. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[43]  E. Virginia Armbrust,et al.  pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[44]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Damon P. Little,et al.  Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode , 2011, PloS one.

[46]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  R. Guimerà,et al.  QUANTITATIVE PATTERNS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MODEL AND EMPIRICAL FOOD WEBS , 2004, q-bio/0401023.

[48]  F. Jordán Keystone species and food webs , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A General Model for Food Web Structure , 2008, Science.

[50]  V. Ranwez,et al.  A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[51]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The Robustness and Restoration of a Network of Ecological Networks , 2012, Science.

[52]  S. Yeaman,et al.  Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations , 2008, Evolutionary applications.

[53]  Dominique Strasberg,et al.  Molecular characterization of trophic ecology within an island radiation of insect herbivores (Curculionidae: Entiminae: Cratopus) , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[54]  H. Charles J. Godfray,et al.  Experimental evidence for apparent competition in a tropical forest food web , 2004, Nature.

[55]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[56]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[57]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[58]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks - foodwebs and beyond , 2009 .

[59]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic trait-based analyses of ecological networks. , 2013, Ecology.

[60]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Logging and forest edges reduce redundancy in plant–frugivore networks in an old‐growth European forest , 2013 .

[62]  Elizabeth L Clare,et al.  Molecular detection of trophic interactions: emerging trends, distinct advantages, significant considerations and conservation applications , 2014, Evolutionary applications.

[63]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[64]  K Williams,et al.  More than a meal. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[65]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Tree diversity alters the structure of a tri‐trophic network in a biodiversity experiment , 2015 .

[66]  Denis Krompass,et al.  Performance, Accuracy, and Web Server for Evolutionary Placement of Short Sequence Reads under Maximum Likelihood , 2011, Systematic biology.

[67]  W. Kurz,et al.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change , 2008, Nature.

[68]  Nicolas Loeuille,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[69]  P. Hebert,et al.  Complementary molecular information changes our perception of food web structure , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  James J. N. Kitson,et al.  Nested metabarcode tagging: a robust tool for studying species interactions in ecology and evolution , 2016, bioRxiv.

[71]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Disentangling the Web of Life , 2009, Science.

[72]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  The Use of Coded PCR Primers Enables High-Throughput Sequencing of Multiple Homolog Amplification Products by 454 Parallel Sequencing , 2007, PloS one.

[73]  Manuel Plantegenest,et al.  Molecular analysis reveals high compartmentalization in aphid–primary parasitoid networks and low parasitoid sharing between crop and noncrop habitats , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[74]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[75]  M. Zobel,et al.  Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Networks Vary throughout the Growing Season and between Successional Stages , 2013, PloS one.

[76]  Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury,et al.  Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation , 2015, AoB PLANTS.

[77]  Brendan Mackey,et al.  Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change: a synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems , 2009 .

[78]  K. Seifert Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[79]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[80]  J. Piñol,et al.  A pragmatic approach to the analysis of diets of generalist predators: the use of next‐generation sequencing with no blocking probes , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[81]  A. Estoup,et al.  Ecological genetics of invasive alien species , 2011, BioControl.

[82]  M. Pocock,et al.  Seeds in farmland food-webs: Resource importance, distribution and the impacts of farm management , 2011 .

[83]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  Assembly of complex plant–fungus networks , 2014, Nature Communications.

[84]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Sampling method influences the structure of plant–pollinator networks , 2011 .