Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.

CONTEXT A Papanicolaou (Pap) test result of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) presents a clinical challenge. Only 5% to 10% of women with ASCUS harbor serious cervical disease, but more than one third of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in screening populations are identified from ASCUS Pap test results. OBJECTIVE To determine whether human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing of residual material from liquid-based Pap tests and referral of cases found to be HPV-positive directly to colposcopy could provide sensitive detection of underlying HSILs in women with ASCUS Pap results, compared with repeat Pap testing. DESIGN AND SETTING Natural history of women with ASCUS Pap smear results, all of whom had liquid-based cytology, HPV testing, and subsequent repeat Pap tests and colposcopy with histologic evaluation, conducted at 12 gynecology clinics in a large managed care organization between October 1995 and June 1996. PARTICIPANTS From a cohort of 46009 women who had routine cervical examinations, 995 women with Pap test results of ASCUS who consented to participate were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cervical histology, HPV test results, and repeat Pap smear results, and sensitivity of HPV testing to identify patients found to have HSIL+ histology. RESULTS Of 995 participants with ASCUS Pap test results, 973 had both a definitive histologic diagnosis and HPV result. Sixty-five (6.7%) had histologic HSIL or cancer. For women with histologic HSIL+, the HPV test was positive in 89.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.4%-95.2%), and the specificity was 64.1 % (95% CI, 60.9%-67.2%). The repeat Pap smear result was abnormal in 76.2% (95% CI, 63.5%-85.7%). Triage based on HPV testing only or on repeat Pap testing only would refer similar proportions (approximately 39%) to colposcopy. The sensitivity of HPV DNA testing for HSIL was equivalent to, if not greater than, that of the repeat Pap test. We further estimated that an HPV-based algorithm including the immediate colposcopy of HPV-positive women, and then repeat Pap testing of all others, would provide an overall sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 88.3%-99.5%). CONCLUSIONS For women with ASCUS Pap tests, HPV DNA testing of residual specimens collected for routine cervical cytology can help identify those who have underlying HSIL. By testing the specimen collected at initial screening, the majority of high-risk cases can be identified and referred for colposcopy based on a single screening.

[1]  V. Lucente,et al.  The promise and risk of a new technology , 1998, Cancer.

[2]  L. Hurley,et al.  Where's the High‐Grade Cervical Neoplasia? The Importance of Minimally Abnormal Papanicolaou Diagnoses , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  T. Wright,et al.  Reflex human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. M. Roberts,et al.  Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test as an adjunct to the conventional Pap smear. , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  T. Wright,et al.  Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy? , 1998, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  T. Wright,et al.  Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL. , 1998, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  Jacalyn L. Papillo,et al.  Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap Test in Clinical Practice , 1998, Acta Cytologica.

[8]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush‐Spatula Collection Procedure , 1998, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[9]  R. V. Donohoo Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  K R Lee,et al.  Comparison of Conventional Papanicolaou Smears and a Fluid‐Based, Thin‐Layer System for Cervical Cancer Screening , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  L. Mango,et al.  Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing , 1997, Cancer.

[12]  J. Bishop,et al.  Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[13]  A. Lorincz Hybrid Capture™ Method for Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Clinical Specimens: A Tool for Clinical Management of Equivocal Pap Smears and for Population Screening , 1996 .

[14]  T. Wright,et al.  Diagnostic performance of Hybrid Capture human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid assay combined with liquid-based cytologic study. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  V. Moreno,et al.  Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer: a Worldwide Perspective , 1995 .

[16]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  T. Wright,et al.  Comparison of Management Algorithms for the Evaluation of Women With Low‐Grade Cytologic Abnormalities , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  A. Ferenczy,et al.  Viral testing for genital human papillomavirus infections: recent progress and clinical potentials , 1995, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[19]  D. Davey,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors , 1994, Diagnostic Cytopathology.

[20]  David R. Scott,et al.  Toward objective quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Correlation of cytopathologic diagnoses with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus types. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  E. Trimble,et al.  Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology , 1994 .

[22]  S Wacholder,et al.  Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  N. Krieger Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[24]  Brown Cl,et al.  The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. , 1990, Acta cytologica.

[25]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[26]  J Linder,et al.  The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies. , 1997, Acta cytologica.