TMS-induced artifacts on EEG can be reduced by rearrangement of the electrode’s lead wire before recording

OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to establish a technique to reduce residual artifacts after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. METHODS We investigated the effects of coil direction and stimulus intensity on residual artifacts in an artificial circuit, and tested whether or not the size of the circuit area affects the residual artifact (the model study). Based on the results, the optimization by rearranging the electrode's lead wire was tested on the human scalp (the human study). RESULTS The residual artifact after TMS was dependent on the direction of the figure-of-eight coil, and on the artificial circuit area size. CONCLUSIONS In accordance with the model study, the scalp EEG shows that TMS-induced artifacts can be reduced dramatically before the amplifier input stages in TMS-EEG experiments by a step-wise procedure rearranging the lead wires relative to the fixed coil orientation. SIGNIFICANCE Our technique makes it possible to significantly reduce the residual artifacts from recordings of short-latency TMS-evoked potentials.

[1]  Gregor Thut,et al.  A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Electroencephalographic recording during transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans and animals , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  The novelty value of the combined use of electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuroscience research , 2006, Brain Research Reviews.

[6]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  J. Karhu,et al.  Efficient reduction of stimulus artefact in TMS–EEG by epithelial short-circuiting by mini-punctures , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG to study cognitive function and cortico–cortico interactions , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Vladimir Litvak,et al.  Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG Offers New Prospects in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[15]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Off-line removal of TMS-induced artifacts on human electroencephalography by Kalman filter , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Sauli Savolainen,et al.  Ipsi- and contralateral EEG reactions to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  TMS-EEG co-registration: On TMS-induced artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.