Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations

Objectives We examined major issues associated with sharing of individual clinical trial data and developed a consensus document on providing access to individual participant data from clinical trials, using a broad interdisciplinary approach. Design and methods This was a consensus-building process among the members of a multistakeholder task force, involving a wide range of experts (researchers, patient representatives, methodologists, information technology experts, and representatives from funders, infrastructures and standards development organisations). An independent facilitator supported the process using the nominal group technique. The consensus was reached in a series of three workshops held over 1 year, supported by exchange of documents and teleconferences within focused subgroups when needed. This work was set within the Horizon 2020-funded project CORBEL (Coordinated Research Infrastructures Building Enduring Life-science Services) and coordinated by the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network. Thus, the focus was on non-commercial trials and the perspective mainly European. Outcome We developed principles and practical recommendations on how to share data from clinical trials. Results The task force reached consensus on 10 principles and 50 recommendations, representing the fundamental requirements of any framework used for the sharing of clinical trials data. The document covers the following main areas: making data sharing a reality (eg, cultural change, academic incentives, funding), consent for data sharing, protection of trial participants (eg, de-identification), data standards, rights, types and management of access (eg, data request and access models), data management and repositories, discoverability, and metadata. Conclusions The adoption of the recommendations in this document would help to promote and support data sharing and reuse among researchers, adequately inform trial participants and protect their rights, and provide effective and efficient systems for preparing, storing and accessing data. The recommendations now need to be implemented and tested in practice. Further work needs to be done to integrate these proposals with those from other geographical areas and other academic domains.

[1]  J. Reichman Rethinking the Role of Clinical Trial Data in International Intellectual Property Law: The Case for a Public Goods Approach , 2009, Marquette intellectual property law review.

[2]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  Guide to the De-Identification of Personal Health Information , 2013 .

[3]  Mark Barnes,et al.  A Global, Neutral Platform for Sharing Trial Data. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Anna-Sara Lind General Data Protection Regulation – final result , 2016 .

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative , 2011, Trials.

[6]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Good practice principles for sharing individual participant data from publicly funded clinical trials , 2015, Trials.

[7]  A. Bailey The use of nominal group technique to determine additional support needs for a group of Victorian TAFE managers and senior educators , 2013 .

[8]  J. Grefenstette,et al.  A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[9]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions , 2015, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[10]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  A critical appraisal of the Article 29 Working Party Opinion 05/2014 on data anonymization techniques , 2015 .

[11]  PhUSE De-Identification Working Group: Providing De-Identification Standards to CDISC Data Models , 2015 .

[12]  P. Várnai,et al.  Assessing the research potential of access to clinical trial data , 2015 .

[13]  Daniel L. Shaw,et al.  US Federal Government Efforts to Improve Clinical Trial Transparency with Expanded Trial Registries and Open Data Sharing. , 2015, AMA journal of ethics.

[14]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[15]  Eric G. Campbell,et al.  The Changing Nature of Scientific Sharing and Withholding in Academic Life Sciences Research: Trends From National Surveys in 2000 and 2013 , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Why data sharing should be the expected norm , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Mercè Crosas,et al.  Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Elisabeth Lex,et al.  Next-generation altmetrics: responsible metrics and evaluation for open science , 2016 .

[19]  A. Marson,et al.  Resource implications of preparing individual participant data from a clinical trial to share with external researchers , 2017, Trials.

[20]  Nancy S. Burns,et al.  Learning What We Didn't Know - The SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  R. Banzi,et al.  IMPACT Observatory: tracking the evolution of clinical trial data sharing and research integrity , 2016, Biochemia medica.

[22]  B. Fitzgerald Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule , 2015 .

[23]  Fiona Godlee,et al.  [Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2017, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[24]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Differential Globalization of Industry- and Non-Industry–Sponsored Clinical Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  T. Lemmens Pharmaceutical Knowledge Governance: A Human Rights Perspective , 2013, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[26]  Rorie Edmunds,et al.  The ICSU World Data System: Trusted Data Services for Global Science , 2014 .

[27]  Douglas J. Joubert,et al.  Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  Christian Ohmann,et al.  A metadata schema for data objects in clinical research , 2016, Trials.

[29]  Heidi Ledford Open-data contest unearths scientific gems — and controversy , 2017, Nature.

[30]  N. Blomberg,et al.  Principles of data management and sharing at European Research Infrastructures , 2014 .

[31]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  The 21st Century Cures Act - A View from the NIH. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  T. Lemmens,et al.  Access to Information and the Right to Health: The Human Rights Case for Clinical Trials Transparency , 2011, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[33]  Carly Strasser,et al.  Data publication consensus and controversies , 2014, F1000Research.

[34]  H. Bauchner,et al.  Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[35]  C. Haug,et al.  Whose Data Are They Anyway? Can a Patient Perspective Advance the Data-Sharing Debate? , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Umbilical vein oxytocin for the treatment of retained placenta (Release Study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[37]  M. Sydes,et al.  How should individual participant data (IPD) from publicly funded clinical trials be shared? , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[38]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Can research ethics committees enable clinical trial data sharing , 2017 .

[39]  Markus Schweizer,et al.  Group Techniques For Program Planning A Guide To Nominal Group And Delphi Processes , 2016 .

[40]  A. Vickers Sharing raw data from clinical trials: what progress since we first asked “Whose data set is it anyway?” , 2016, Trials.

[41]  Ben Goldacre,et al.  OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials , 2016, Trials.

[42]  C. Gross,et al.  Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey , 2014, Trials.

[43]  Yvonne M. Socha,et al.  OUT OF CITE, OUT OF MIND: THE CURRENT STATE OF PRACTICE, POLICY, AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE CITATION OF DATA CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices , 2013 .