Non-Invasive Assessment of Intravascular Pressure Gradients: A Review of Current and Proposed Novel Methods

Invasive catheterization is associated with a low risk of serious complications. However, although it is the gold standard for measuring pressure gradients, it induces changes to blood flow and requires significant resources. Therefore, non-invasive alternatives are urgently needed. Pressure gradients are routinely estimated non-invasively in clinical settings using ultrasound and calculated with the simplified Bernoulli equation, a method with several limitations. A PubMed literature search on validation of non-invasive techniques was conducted, and studies were included if non-invasively estimated pressure gradients were compared with invasively measured pressure gradients in vivo. Pressure gradients were mainly estimated from velocities obtained with Doppler ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Most studies used the simplified Bernoulli equation, but more recent studies have employed the expanded Bernoulli and Navier–Stokes equations. Overall, the studies reported good correlation between non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients and catheterization. Despite having strong correlations, several studies reported the non-invasive techniques to either overestimate or underestimate the invasive measurements, thus questioning the accuracy of the non-invasive methods. In conclusion, more advanced imaging techniques may be needed to overcome the shortcomings of current methods.

[1]  C. Thomsen,et al.  A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  L. Lönn,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of Pressure Changes Using 2-D Vector Velocity Ultrasound: An Experimental Study With In Vivo Examples , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[3]  Fiorenzo Gaita,et al.  Inaccuracy of Right Atrial Pressure Estimates Through Inferior Vena Cava Indices. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen,et al.  Common Carotid Artery Flow Measured by 3-D Ultrasonic Vector Flow Imaging and Validated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2017, European heart journal.

[6]  H. Tsutsui,et al.  Overestimation by echocardiography of the peak systolic pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium due to tricuspid regurgitation and the usefulness of the early diastolic transpulmonary valve pressure gradient for estimating pulmonary artery pressure , 2017, Heart and Vessels.

[7]  J. Chambers,et al.  Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  Aiqi Sun,et al.  Real-time phase-contrast flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance with low-rank modeling and parallel imaging , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[9]  Debiao Li,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of pressure gradient across a coronary stenosis using phase contrast (PC)‐MRI: A feasibility study , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Beyond Bernoulli , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  J. Cigarroa,et al.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease , 2016, Circulation.

[12]  P. Crosland NICE: Chest pain of recent onset , 2016, British Journal of Cardiac Nursing.

[13]  Heye Zhang,et al.  Functional assessment of the stenotic carotid artery by CFD-based pressure gradient evaluation. , 2016, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  M. Markl,et al.  Advanced flow MRI: emerging techniques and applications. , 2016, Clinical radiology.

[15]  M. Markl,et al.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  Mathias J. Krause,et al.  MRI‐based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Tino Ebbers,et al.  Phase-contrast MRI volume flow – a comparison of breath held and navigator based acquisitions , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[18]  G. Kim,et al.  Turbulent Kinetic Energy Measurement Using Phase Contrast MRI for Estimating the Post-Stenotic Pressure Drop: In Vitro Validation and Clinical Application , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  Héctor Bueno,et al.  Guía ESC/ERS 2015 sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar , 2016 .

[20]  J. Vachiéry,et al.  [2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension]. , 2015, Kardiologia polska.

[21]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  C. Sirtori,et al.  Status and potential clinical value of a transthoracic evaluation of the coronary arteries , 2015, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[23]  Rachel D. Torok,et al.  Coarctation of the aorta: Management from infancy to adulthood. , 2015, World journal of cardiology.

[24]  M. Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging , 2015, Nature.

[25]  E. Marchiori,et al.  Chest magnetic resonance imaging: a protocol suggestion* , 2015, Radiologia brasileira.

[26]  Arun A. Joseph,et al.  Peak flow velocities in the ascending aorta-real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging vs. cine magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. , 2015, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[27]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[28]  Matt A. Bernstein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[29]  Roland Krug,et al.  Cardiac MR imaging: current status and future direction. , 2015, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[30]  D. Comaniciu,et al.  Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment, treatment outcome prediction and follow-up of aortic coarctation from MR imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[31]  J. Schaller,et al.  MRI‐based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: Clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[33]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Pressure gradient prediction in aortic coarctation using a computational-fluid-dynamics model: validation against invasive pressure catheterization at rest and pharmacological stress , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[34]  D. Saloner,et al.  MR physics in practice: how to optimize acquisition quality and time for cardiac MR imaging. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[35]  P. Barker,et al.  Comparison of invasive and non-invasive pressure gradients in aortic arch obstruction , 2015, Cardiology in the Young.

[36]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of 2-D pressure gradients in steady flow using ultrasound , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[37]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Guoxi Xie,et al.  Pressure gradient measurement in the coronary artery using 4D PC-MRI: towards noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[39]  Fu-Shan Jaw,et al.  High-Resolution Structural and Functional Assessments of Cerebral Microvasculature Using 3D Gas ΔR2*-mMRA , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Maxime Cannesson,et al.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications , 2013, Frontiers of Medicine.

[41]  D. Comaniciu,et al.  Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Coarctation: Validation with In Vivo Measurements , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  B. Dasgupta,et al.  Role of diagnostic ultrasound in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases , 2012, Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease.

[43]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[44]  Sanjiv J Shah,et al.  Inaccuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension: implications for clinical practice. , 2011, Chest.

[45]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). , 2010, European heart journal.

[46]  N. Shahidi,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Heart.

[47]  H. Yamazawa Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary? , 2010, [Hokkaido igaku zasshi] The Hokkaido journal of medical science.

[48]  D. Bach,et al.  Echo/Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement: principles of interrogation and evaluation of high gradients. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[49]  T. Hole,et al.  Transthoracic echocardiography for imaging of the different coronary artery segments: a feasibility study , 2009, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[50]  A. Kono,et al.  Utility of phase contrast MR imaging for assessment of pulmonary flow and pressure estimation in patients with pulmonary hypertension: Comparison with right heart catheterization and echocardiography , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[51]  T. Forbes,et al.  Echocardiographic evaluation of pressure gradient across the stent in patients treated for coarctation of the aorta. , 2009, Congenital heart disease.

[52]  E. A. Bae,et al.  Doppler ultrasound in mitral stenosis. Assessment of pressure gradient and atrioventricular pressure half-time. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[53]  M. Corretti,et al.  Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. , 2009, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[54]  B. Peterson,et al.  What is an image? , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[55]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. , 2007, Radiology.

[56]  O Wieben,et al.  Noninvasive Measurement of Intra-Aneurysmal Pressure and Flow Pattern Using Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[57]  J. Carrozza,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of translesion pressure gradients in peripheral arteries: comparison of pressure wire and catheter-derived measurements. , 2007, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[58]  Z. Jing,et al.  Complications of right heart catheterization procedures in patients with pulmonary hypertension in experienced centers. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  R. Mohiaddin,et al.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI , 2005, European Radiology.

[60]  Amir A Amini,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase‐contrast MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  P. Dimitrow,et al.  Imaging of all three coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography. an illustrated guide , 2003, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[62]  Rolf Fimmers,et al.  Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study , 2003, The Lancet.

[63]  Abi Berger,et al.  How does it work?: Magnetic resonance imaging , 2002 .

[64]  M. Chandra,et al.  Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[65]  T Ebbers,et al.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase contrast MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[66]  F. Moll,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation before and after percutaneous therapy of iliac artery stenoses: the value of the Bernoulli-predicted pressure gradient. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[67]  M. Vanauker,et al.  Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet. , 2000, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[68]  C. Thomsen,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Valvular Heart Disease , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[69]  G Maurer,et al.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[70]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[71]  D N Firmin,et al.  Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[72]  R. Green,et al.  Measurement of carotid bifurcation pressure gradients using the Bernoulli principle. , 1996, Cardiovascular surgery.

[73]  J. Jensen Estimation of Blood Velocities Using Ultrasound: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[74]  Leonard Mermel,et al.  Prevention of Intravascular CatheterRelated Infections , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[75]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[76]  H. Rieger,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Pressure Gradients Across Iliac Artery Stenoses: Duplex and Catheter Correlative Study , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[77]  J B Seward,et al.  Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study. , 1989, Circulation.

[78]  P. Rao,et al.  Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pressure gradients across aortic coarctation. , 1989, American heart journal.

[79]  M. Crawford,et al.  Valvular heart disease. , 1989 .

[80]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[81]  G. Peterson,et al.  The use of deep duplex scanning to predict hemodynamically significant aortoiliac stenoses. , 1988, Journal of vascular surgery.

[82]  K. Beach,et al.  Assessment of pressure gradient by Doppler ultrasound: experimental and clinical observations. , 1987, Journal of vascular surgery.

[83]  A. Houston,et al.  Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of severity of coarctation of the aorta and interruption of the aortic arch. , 1987, British heart journal.

[84]  G. Marx,et al.  Accuracy and pitfalls of Doppler evaluation of the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[85]  P. Yock,et al.  Comparison of Doppler-derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic valve stenosis: implications for management. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[86]  J. Seward,et al.  Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[87]  B. Wranne,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[88]  L. Hatle,et al.  Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. , 1985, British heart journal.

[89]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. , 1985, Circulation.

[90]  P. R. Moran,et al.  Verification and evaluation of internal flow and motion. True magnetic resonance imaging by the phase gradient modulation method. , 1985, Radiology.

[91]  D. Firmin,et al.  Measurement of Flow with NMR Imaging Using a Gradient Pulse and Phase Difference Technique , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[92]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[93]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[94]  W. Grossman,et al.  Changes in arterial pressure during left heart pullback in patients with aortic stenosis: a sign of severe aortic stenosis. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[95]  L Hatle,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1978, British heart journal.

[96]  Sriram Narayanan,et al.  Computational Methods to Predict the Risk of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2018 .

[97]  J. Caro ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease , 2012 .

[98]  B. Carabello,et al.  Contemporary Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Hemodynamics in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of the 21st Century , 2012 .

[99]  P. Kilner,et al.  [Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010)]. , 2011, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[100]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[101]  P. Munk,et al.  Transactions on Ultrasonics , Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control : A New Method for Estimation of Velocity Vectors , 2007 .

[102]  C Mistretta,et al.  Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[103]  J. Hogg Magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service.

[104]  P. R. Moran A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. , 1982, Magnetic resonance imaging.