The promise of faculty care in undergraduate STEM courses

Work in Progress. Introductory, or “weed out” chemistry courses are well-known for deterring undergraduate students from pursuing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. Specifically, students' motivations resulting from experiences in these courses can influence STEM retention. Using grounded theory, our preliminary analysis of qualitative data collected in an undergraduate chemistry course has identified “faculty care” as an emergent construct of importance to student motivations. Our emergent definition of care is students' perception that their instructors recognize and communicate actionable steps towards self-improvement or illustrate concern, encouragement, or relational interest for the students in academic and non-academic settings, or in an unexpected, personal way. We found that students hold gendered interpretations of faculty care, and these interpretations may give rise to gendered motivational attitudes. This work raises questions about the ways specific classroom activities or faculty-student interactions allow faculty to communicate a sense of care for their students and thereby affect students' motivational attitudes in their classrooms. More broadly, this work may have implications for our understanding of the ways faculty can address gendered patterns in STEM participation.

[1]  Mark R. Young The Motivational Effects of the Classroom Environment in Facilitating Self-Regulated Learning , 2005, Journal of Marketing Education.

[2]  Alison M. Dachner,et al.  If You Don’t Care, Then Why Should I? The Influence of Instructor Commitment on Student Satisfaction and Commitment , 2015 .

[3]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  R. Vallerand,et al.  From Environmental Factors to Outcomes: A Test of an Integrated Motivational Sequence , 2004 .

[5]  Linda Hughes Faculty‐student interactions and the student‐perceived climate for caring , 1992, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[6]  Robert J. Vallerand,et al.  On the relative effects of positive and negative verbal feedback on males' and females' intrinsic motivation. , 1988 .

[7]  R. B. Johnson Examining the Validity Structure of Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[8]  J. Meece,et al.  Gender and motivation , 2006 .

[9]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Individual Differences in Achievement Goals: A Longitudinal Study of Cognitive, Emotional, and Achievement Outcomes. , 2008 .

[10]  E. Deci,et al.  The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective , 2000 .

[11]  Brian Rubineau Gendering professions : an analysis of peer effects , 2007 .

[12]  Diane D. Chapman,et al.  “That Truly Meant a Lot to Me”: A Qualitative Examination of Meaningful Faculty-Student Interactions , 2015 .

[13]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[14]  Tim Urdan,et al.  Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs , 2006 .

[15]  Meera Komarraju,et al.  Role of Student–Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement , 2010 .

[16]  B. Zimmerman Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview , 1990 .

[17]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[19]  K. Wentzel Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. , 1997 .

[20]  E. Skinner,et al.  Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children's Academic Engagement and Performance. , 2003 .

[21]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. , 1999 .

[22]  ชวิตรา ตันติมาลา Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis , 2017 .

[23]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. , 2007 .

[24]  E. Deci,et al.  Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[26]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[27]  S. Anthoney Students in context: Effects of psychological needs and environmental press on academic and life satisfaction , 2011 .

[28]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[29]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[30]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[31]  L. E. Hanson,et al.  Nursing students' perspectives: experiences of caring and not-so-caring interactions with faculty. , 1996, The Journal of nursing education.

[32]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .