VoIP Diffusion among New Entrants: A Path Dependent Process

The path dependency literature provides insights on the dynamic allocation processes in which events are non-ergodic and have multiple absorbing states. Technological change belongs to this class of processes. This paper contributes to this conceptual framework by analysing the distinction between path and past dependence. The aim is to investigate how firms implement new innovations in localized technological changes. This conceptual framework is developed to present a longitudinal case study describing the history of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) diffusion using data triangulation. From the empirical findings, it emerges that new entrants have applied the technology with creativity, following a path dependent process, offering free voice communication, while incumbents have applied the technology within a past dependent pattern and thus the benefits to their customers have been reduced and delayed.

[1]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[2]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The diffusion of Internet telephony among consumers and firms , 2003 .

[3]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Mapping the evolving telecoms industry: the uses and shortcomings of the layer model , 2002 .

[4]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  Economic factors and diffusion of IP telephony: Empirical evidence from an advanced market , 2008 .

[5]  Ulrich Witt,et al.  "Lock-in" vs. "critical masses" -- Industrial change under network externalities , 1997 .

[6]  Peter Galvin,et al.  The Changing Technological Profile of the Leading ICT Firms: Evidence from US Patent Data, 1981-2000 , 2004 .

[7]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Industrial Dynamics and the Evolution of Firms' and Nations' Competitive Capabilities in the World Computer Industry , 1997 .

[8]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[9]  Tommaso M. Valletti,et al.  Competition in telecommunications: an introduction , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[11]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[12]  J. Houghton.  Mapping information industries and markets , 1999 .

[13]  Alain Rallet,et al.  Nouvelle économie et commerce électronique: mesure et démesure , 2003, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[14]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[15]  Robin Mason.  Internet telephony and the international accounting rate system , 1998 .

[16]  U. Witt.  Propositions about novelty , 2009 .

[17]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[18]  M. Meeus,et al.  Firm behaviour and innovative performance: An empirical exploration of the selection–adaptation debate , 2000 .

[19]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy , 1994 .

[20]  K Aoki,et al.  Convergence and new regulatory frameworks: A comparative study of regulatory approaches to Internet telephony , 1998 .

[21]  Edwin Blake,et al.  VoIP deregulation in South Africa: Implications for underserviced areas , 2006 .

[22]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[23]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods: Alternative mechanisms for provision of public goods , 1996 .

[24]  N. Rosenberg.  Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives , 2000 .

[25]  W. Scott,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[26]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  INDUCED INNOVATION, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PATH DEPENDENCE: SOURCES OF TECHNICAL CHANGE* , 1997 .

[27]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[28]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of “End-to-End” , 2001 .

[29]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[30]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach for the Economics of Knowledge , 2006 .

[31]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[32]  P. Geroski.  Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localized Technological Change in the Network of Networks: the Interaction between Regulation and the Evolution of Technology in Telecommunications , 1995 .

[35]  Peter Galvin,et al.  MODULARITY ON INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: THE CASE OF THE WORLD THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT BICYCLE INDUSTRY , 2001 .

[36]  Jaber F. Gubrium,et al.  Introduction: inside qualitative research , 2002 .

[37]  Fabio M. Manenti,et al.  Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and empirical evidence from the European union , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[38]  David C. Mowery.  Sources of Industrial Leadership: The Computer Software Industry , 1999 .

[39]  N. Economides.  The economics of networks , 1996 .

[40]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[41]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[42]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus , 1974 .

[43]  S. Laestadius.  The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper , 1998 .

[44]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[45]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  What are innovation opportunities , 2004 .

[46]  M. Einhorn.  Internet Voice, ‘Cyberbypass’, Competitive Efficiency , 1996 .

[47]  John Metcalfe.  Ed Mansfield and the Diffusion of Innovation: An Evolutionary Connection , 2004 .

[48]  R. Cowan,et al.  Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control Strategies , 1996 .

[49]  L. Dibiaggio.  Design complexity, vertical disintegration and knowledge organization in the semiconductor industry , 2007 .

[50]  P. David.  Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science , 2007 .

[51]  H. Tikkanen,et al.  Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945–1995 , 2006 .

[52]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[53]  The telecoms boom and bust, 1996-2002: Puzzles, paradoxes, and processing , 2004 .

[54]  Oz Shy,et al.  The Economics of Network Industries , 2002 .

[55]  P. Klemperer.  Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade , 1992 .

[56]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization , 1997 .

[57]  P. David,et al.  Technical choice innovation and economic growth , 1975 .

[58]  A. Davies.  Innovation in Large Technical Systems: The Case of Telecommunications , 1996 .

[59]  R. Mason,et al.  Competition in Communication Networks: Pricing and Regulation , 2001 .

[60]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[61]  Jackie Krafft,et al.  Vertical structure of the industry and competition: an analysis of the evolution of the info-communications industry , 2003 .

[62]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Economies of scope in the U.S. telecommunications industry 1 The listing of authorship is alphabetic , 1998 .

[63]  C. Antonelli.  Models of knowledge and systems of governance , 2005, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[64]  Richard A. Cawley.  Internet, lies and telephony , 1997 .

[65]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Evolution of the telecommunications industry , 2003 .

[66]  Davide Consoli,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Change in UK Retail Banking Services: An Evolutionary Perspective , 2005 .

[67]  C. Antonelli.  Path Dependence, Localised Technological Change and the Quest for Dynamic Efficiency , 2006 .

[68]  Douglas Sicker,et al.  Leveraging the EU regulatory framework to improve a layered policy model for US telecommunications markets , 2006 .

[69]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[70]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[71]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[72]  Richard K. Blundel.  ‘Little Ships’: The Co‐evolution of Technological Capabilities and Industrial Dynamics in Competing Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[73]  A. D. Amar,et al.  Impact of wireless telecommunications standards and regulation on the evolution of wireless technologies and services over Internet protocol , 2006 .

[74]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  The Digital Economy: what is new and what is not? , 2004 .

[75]  Dominique Foray,et al.  The dynamic implications of increasing returns: Technological change and path dependent inefficiency , 1997 .

[76]  M. Bourreau,et al.  An Economist's Guide to Local Loop Unbundling , 2007 .