Multiplex quantification of 12 European Union authorized genetically modified maize lines with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

Presence of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food and feed products is regulated in many countries. The European Union (EU) has implemented a threshold for labeling of products containing more than 0.9% of authorized GMOs per ingredient. As the number of GMOs has increased over time, standard-curve based simplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses are no longer sufficiently cost-effective, despite widespread use of initial PCR based screenings. Newly developed GMO detection methods, also multiplex methods, are mostly focused on screening and detection but not quantification. On the basis of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology, multiplex assays for quantification of all 12 EU authorized GM maize lines (per April first 2015) were developed. Because of high sequence similarity of some of the 12 GM targets, two separate multiplex assays were needed. In both assays (4-plex and 10-plex), the transgenes were labeled with one fluorescence reporter and the endogene with another (GMO concentration = transgene/endogene ratio). It was shown that both multiplex assays produce specific results and that performance parameters such as limit of quantification, repeatability, and trueness comply with international recommendations for GMO quantification methods. Moreover, for samples containing GMOs, the throughput and cost-effectiveness is significantly improved compared to qPCR. Thus, it was concluded that the multiplex ddPCR assays could be applied for routine quantification of 12 EU authorized GM maize lines. In case of new authorizations, the events can easily be added to the existing multiplex assays. The presented principle of quantitative multiplexing can be applied to any other domain.

[1]  Kristina Gruden,et al.  The GMOseek matrix: a decision support tool for optimizing the detection of genetically modified plants , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  Arne Holst-Jensen,et al.  A statistical approach for evaluation of PCR results to improve the practical limit of quantification (LOQ) of GMO analyses (SIMQUANT) , 2008 .

[3]  H. Waiblinger,et al.  Validation and collaborative study of a P35S and T-nos duplex real-time PCR screening method to detect genetically modified organisms in food products , 2008 .

[4]  S H Neoh,et al.  Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. , 1992, BioTechniques.

[5]  Savini Cristian,et al.  Technical Guidance Document from the European Union Reference Laboratory for Genetically Modified Food and Feed on the Implementation of Commission Regulation (EU) No 619/2011 , 2011 .

[6]  G. Berben,et al.  Development and validation of duplex, triplex, and pentaplex real-time PCR screening assays for the detection of genetically modified organisms in food and feed. , 2013, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[7]  Kristina Gruden,et al.  GMO quantification: valuable experience and insights for the future , 2014, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[8]  Assessment of droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of genetically engineered OXY235 canola and DP305423 soybean samples , 2014 .

[9]  Philippe Corbisier,et al.  Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[10]  Hans-Ulrich Waiblinger,et al.  A practical approach to screen for authorised and unauthorised genetically modified plants , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[11]  H. Berthoud,et al.  Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for four genetically modified maize varieties and maize DNA content in food. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[12]  Benjamin J. Hindson,et al.  Evaluation of a Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Format for DNA Copy Number Quantification , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  L. Hougs,et al.  Detecting un-authorized genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived materials. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[14]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Digital PCR. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  GMOseek: a user friendly tool for optimized GMO testing , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  C. Foy,et al.  The applicability of digital PCR for the assessment of detection limits in GMO analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Mojca Milavec,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Food and Feed Samples with Droplet Digital PCR , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[19]  J. Mano,et al.  Interlaboratory validation of quantitative duplex real-time PCR method for screening analysis of genetically modified maize. , 2011, Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan.

[20]  Maja Ravnikar,et al.  Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR shows high resilience to PCR inhibitors from plant, soil and water samples , 2014, Plant Methods.

[21]  P. Corbisier,et al.  Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[22]  M. Mura,et al.  Quantitation using informative zeros (QUIZ): Application for GMO detection and quantification without recourse to certified reference material , 2010 .

[23]  Savini Cristian,et al.  Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL) , 2008 .

[24]  Arne Holst-Jensen,et al.  Coherence between legal requirements and approaches for detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derived products. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[25]  Knut G Berdal,et al.  The modular analytical procedure and validation approach and the units of measurement for genetically modified materials in foods and feeds. , 2004, Journal of AOAC International.

[26]  M. Baker Digital PCR hits its stride , 2012, Nature Methods.