Preparing future teachers to anticipate student difficulties in physics in a graduate-level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research

(Received 10 November 2009; revised manuscript received 4 February 2011; published 20 May 2011) We describe courses designed to help future teachers reflect on and discuss both physics content and student knowledge thereof. We use three kinds of activities: reading and discussing the literature, experiencing research-based curricular materials, and learning to use the basic research methods of physics education research. We present a general overview of the two courses we have designed as well as a framework for assessing student performance on physics content knowledge and one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge—knowledge of student ideas—about one particular content area: electric circuits. We find that the quality of future teachers’ responses, especially on questions dealing with knowledge of student ideas, can be successfully categorized and may be higher for those with a nonphysics background than those with a physics background.

[1]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Making Sense of How Students Make Sense of Mechanical Waves , 1999, physics/0207092.

[2]  Stephen Emile Kanim.  An investigation of student difficulties in qualitative and quantitative problem solving: Examples from electric circuits and electrostatics , 1999 .

[3]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Making Their Own Connections: Students' Understanding of Multiple Models in Basic Electricity , 1999 .

[4]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Activity-based Tutorials. Volume I: Introductory Physics , 2004 .

[5]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  The challenge of matching learning assessments to teaching goals: An example from the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems , 1998 .

[6]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[7]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High School Physics Teachers. , 2010 .

[8]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  Use of Analogy in Learning Physics: The Role of Representations. , 2006 .

[9]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 1998 .

[10]  Michael C. Wittmann,et al.  Integrated approaches in physics education: A graduate level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research , 2006, physics/0608240.

[11]  P. Mulhall,et al.  In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice , 2004 .

[12]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Content Knowledge for Teaching , 2008 .

[13]  Irene Bloom,et al.  Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol , 2002 .

[14]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Activity-based Tutorials. Volume 2: Modern Physics , 2005 .

[15]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves , 2002, physics/0207031.

[16]  Juan R. Burciaga,et al.  Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite , 2004 .

[17]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves , 2007 .

[18]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning” , 2001 .

[19]  Dan MacIsaac,et al.  Reforming Physics Instruction Via RTOP , 2002 .

[20]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[22]  Renee Michelle Goertzen,et al.  Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning , 2010 .

[23]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Real-Time Physics , 1998 .

[24]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[25]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[26]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[27]  D. Ball,et al.  Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers' Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students , 2008, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[28]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies , 1992 .

[29]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[30]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student understanding of the work‐energy and impulse‐momentum theorems , 1987 .

[31]  C. Wieman,et al.  Transforming Physics Education , 2005 .

[32]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and its Implications for Science Education , 2001 .

[33]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .