Carrying capacity using emergy and a new calculation of the ecological footprint

Abstract Carrying capacity was evaluated using emergy assessment to improve the diagnosis of problems and to make understanding sustainability easier, thereby supporting the formulation of public policies. Ibiuna County has an area of 105,800 hectare (ha) and it is located 72 km west of Sao Paulo, the largest Brazilian city. It has 72,029 inhabitants or 0.68 people per ha, but 2.16 people per ha of forest area. The city is only 157 years old and about 67% of its population lives in the rural area and the other 33% in the urban space. In our assessment, the percent renewability of this municipality was high (47.20%). To determine the renewable support area, the carrying capacity methodology suggested by Brown and Ulgiati (2001) was applied and the support area calculated was 306,679 ha or 0.23 people per ha. This result reveals a value for the equivalent natural area needed to absorb the impacts of the fossil fuel consumed in the production of industrial inputs used in the region. A recently proposed ecological footprint methodology was used, where the calculus of support area is based on the consumption profile of the population. This methodology was adapted to obtain an alternate carrying capacity for the county. The result was 249,650 ha or 0.29 individuals per ha. This study showed the importance of preserving natural areas and it introduced the need for changes in the configuration of the county economy and in its population's lifestyle, which are needed to turn Ibiuna County into a truly sustainable region.

[1]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  The solar transformity of petroleum fuels , 2009 .

[2]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Integrated food, energy and environmental services production as an alternative for small rural properties in Brazil , 2012 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Emergy evaluations of the global biogeochemical cycles of six biologically active elements and two compounds , 2014 .

[4]  Feni Agostinho,et al.  Support area as an indicator of environmental load: Comparison between Embodied Energy, Ecological Footprint, and Emergy Accounting methods , 2013 .

[5]  Wenlong Li,et al.  A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application , 2005 .

[6]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  A modified footprint method: The case study of Brazil , 2012 .

[7]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Emergy accounting for regional studies: case study of Canada and its provinces. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane , 2010 .

[9]  Tim R. McClanahan,et al.  EMergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals , 1996 .

[10]  Paolo Vassallo,et al.  Energy and resource basis of an Italian coastal resort region integrated using emergy synthesis. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  M. Cuadra,et al.  Assessment of economic and ecological carrying capacity of agricultural crops in Nicaragua , 2007 .

[12]  D. Campbell Emergy Analysis of Human Carrying Capacity and Regional Sustainability: an Example Using the State of Maine , 1998 .

[13]  Guobin Liu,et al.  Emergy measures of carrying capacity and sustainability of a target region for an ecological restoration programme: a case study in Loess Hilly Region, China. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[15]  D. Campbell,et al.  Relationships among the Energy, Emergy, and Money Flows of the United States from 1900 to 2011 , 2014, Front. Energy Res..

[16]  F. Agostinho,et al.  Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices , 2008 .

[17]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas , 2005 .

[18]  Zhishi Wang,et al.  Emergy synthesis of tourism-based urban ecosystem. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Bin Chen,et al.  Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy—A case study of the Chinese society , 2006 .

[20]  Shaoqi Zhou,et al.  Per capita resource consumption and resource carrying capacity: A comparison of the sustainability of 17 mainstream countries , 2012 .

[21]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas , 2011 .

[22]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments , 2001 .

[23]  Daniel E. Campbell,et al.  Development of a multidisciplinary approach to assess regional sustainability , 2010 .

[24]  Yoshihiko Wada,et al.  Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: A focus on China and India , 2012 .

[25]  Qin-Pu Liu,et al.  A Modified Model of Ecological Footprint Accounting and Its Application to Cropland in Jiangsu, China , 2008 .

[26]  Marina Lasagni,et al.  Trends in Ecological Physical Chemistry. , 1994 .

[27]  Shanshin Ton,et al.  Holistic emergy analysis of Macao , 2008 .

[28]  Ke Song,et al.  The emergy ecological footprint for small fish farm in China , 2013 .

[29]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  EMERGY ANALYSIS OF ITALIAN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM. THE ROLE OF ENERGY QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL INPUTS , 1993 .