BENCHMARKING AS A MIXED METAPHOR: DISENTANGLING ASSUMPTIONS OF COMPETITION AND COLLABORATION*

Examination of the management literature on benchmarking reveals that the concept conveys a mixed metaphor. While collaboration among benchmarking partners is advocated, description of benchmarking practice is dominated by principles and language that convey notions of competition. The ‘competitive’ approach to benchmarking is due to four narrow, constricting assumptions: (1) that the motivation behind benchmarking is to improve and reduce a performance gap relative to some superior comparison other, (2) that benchmarking is a formal, organizationally sanctioned means of competing with others, including partners, (3) that benchmarking involves comparison through measurement or marking, and (4) that benchmarking is an activity initiated (and assessable) by one party. Two opposing concepts of benchmarking (as competition) and benchmarking (as collaboration) are introduced to develop a model for predicting the degree of competition and/or collaboration involved in relationships between benchmarking parties. Key factors within this model include context, activities, partnership and outcomes.

[1]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[2]  The argument against adopting a “Process” mentality , 1993 .

[3]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .

[5]  William D. Roering,et al.  Sleeping with the enemy: Doing business with a competitor , 1994 .

[6]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[7]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Does Strategy Research Need Game Theory , 1991 .

[8]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[9]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[10]  Thomas A Foster,et al.  LOGISTICS BENCHMARKING: SEARCHING FOR THE BEST. , 1992 .

[11]  Eric Trist,et al.  Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains , 1983 .

[12]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Conflicting Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualizing Their Use in the Field of Organizational Change , 1996 .

[13]  H. Willmott.  STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS* , 1993 .

[14]  Andrzej Huczynski,et al.  Applying the Benchmarking Approach to Absence Control , 1990 .

[15]  B. Gray.  Cross-Sectoral Partners: Collaborative Alliances among Business, Government and Communities , 1996 .

[16]  L. Wheeler.  A brief history of social comparison theory. , 1991 .

[17]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[18]  D. Garvin.  How the Baldrige Award really works. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[19]  David S. Steingard,et al.  A Postmodern Deconstruction of Total Quality Management (TQM) , 1993 .

[20]  Gregory H. Watson,et al.  Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's Best , 1993 .

[21]  Steven Katz,et al.  How benchmarking goes wrong (and how to do it right) , 1993 .

[22]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[23]  Rene Kienzle,et al.  J MacNeil J Testi J Cupples and M Rimmer (1994) Benchmarking Australia: Linking Enterprises to World Best Practice Melbourne: Longman Cheshire , 1996 .

[24]  J. S. Himes.  Conflict and Conflict Management , 1980 .

[25]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[26]  Fiona Wilson,et al.  Language, Technology, Gender, and Power , 1992 .

[27]  V. J. Ramsey,et al.  A Feminist Critique of Organizational Humanism , 1994 .

[28]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[29]  B. Gray,et al.  Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Practice to Theory , 1991 .

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[31]  F. A. Frost,et al.  BENCHMARKING OR THE SEARCH FOR INDUSTRY BEST‐PRACTICE: A SURVEY OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SECTOR , 1993 .

[32]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[33]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Burning your britches behind you: Can policy scholars bank on game theory? , 1991 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[35]  S. Sackmann.  Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge , 1992 .

[36]  John K Murnighan,et al.  Game theory and organizational behavior , 1994 .

[37]  Stephen Linstead,et al.  From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Ethnography , 1993 .

[38]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Knowledge Generation in Organization Theory , 1993 .

[39]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[40]  P. Ring.  Fragile and Resilient Trust and Their Roles in Economic Exchange , 1996 .

[41]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Organizational change : a processual approach , 1994 .

[42]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  The Context of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Garment Industry: An Institutional Perspective , 1991 .

[43]  Carol J. McNair,et al.  Benchmarking : A Tool for Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[44]  K. Boulding,et al.  Value Systems and Social Process. , 1971 .

[45]  井口 道生.  W. Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White: The Elements of Style, MacMillan Co,, New York, 1959, 71頁, 13×21cm, $2.95. Paperback 11×17cm, $0.95 , 1971 .

[46]  J. Suls,et al.  Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. , 1991 .

[47]  Gregory H. Watson,et al.  The benchmarking workbook : adapting best practices for performance improvement , 1992 .

[48]  M. Sako,et al.  Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan. , 1994 .

[49]  R. Kanter,et al.  The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. , 1994 .

[50]  K. Jennings,et al.  Benchmarking for strategic action. , 1992, The Journal of business strategy.

[51]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[52]  Arthur Turovh Himmelman,et al.  On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice , 1996 .

[53]  Michael J. Spendolini,et al.  The Benchmarking Book , 1992 .

[54]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[55]  Y. K. Shetty,et al.  Aiming high: Competitive benchmarking for superior performance , 1993 .

[56]  E. Zajac,et al.  FROM TRANSACTION COST TO TRANSACTIONAL VALUE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES* , 1993 .

[57]  R. Boxwell.  Benchmarking for competitive advantage , 1994 .

[58]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[59]  Garth Saloner.  Modeling, game theory, and strategic management , 1991 .

[60]  Christopher E. Bogan,et al.  Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation , 1994 .

[61]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[62]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[63]  Jinichiro Nakane,et al.  Benchmarking Global Manufacturing: Understanding International Suppliers, Customers, and Competitors , 1992 .

[64]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[65]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  The Play of Metaphors , 1993 .

[66]  M. Dodgson.  Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[67]  R. Jacques.  Critique and Theory Building: Producing Knowledge “From the Kitchen” , 1992 .

[68]  H. Tsoukas.  The Missing Link: A Transformational View of Metaphors in Organizational Science , 1991 .

[69]  J. G. Gros,et al.  Quality in R&D: R&D Benchmarking at AT&T , 1992 .

[70]  Rudi K. F. Bresser.  Matching collective and competitive strategies , 1988 .

[71]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[72]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Intra- and Interorganizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda , 1995 .

[73]  R. Kanter,et al.  The Challenge of organizational change : how companies experience it and leaders guide it , 1993 .

[74]  M. Dodgson.  Learning, Trust, and Technological Collaboration , 1993 .

[75]  D. Ernst,et al.  Collaborating to compete : using strategic alliances and acquisitions in the global marketplace , 1993 .

[76]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[77]  M. Myrtek,et al.  1 – DEFINITIONS AND MODELS , 1984 .

[78]  G. Vickers,et al.  The art of judgment , 1965 .

[79]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[80]  James N. Vedder.  How much can we learn from success , 1992 .

[81]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 20 (1993) lSlLl70. North-Holland Learning through alliances , 1991 .