Knowing, Communication and Experiencing through Body and Emotion

With new technologies such as body sensors, tangible interaction, haptics, interactive cloth, or small computing devices such as mobiles, we can move interaction from the desktop out into the world and onto our bodies. Likewise, with the boom of computer games, domestic digital technology use, and social communication tools, we have to consider designing for non-instrumental goals, beyond task completion. This has been picked up by human-computer interaction researchers in the so-called third wave of HCI. We suggest that learning technologies could use some of the results from the third wave of HCI, placing body and emotion more centrally into the communication and construction of knowledge. Designing for bodily interaction, emotional communication or aesthetics is not trivial. In design work, a designer can only set the stage for certain experience to happen, but in the end, it is the user who co-constructs the experience with or through the interaction. Based on our experiences of designing for bodily and emotional communication, we will posit three postulates that might be helpful in designing for involving interaction: leaving dasiasurfacespsila open for users to appropriate, building for users to recognise themselves socially, emotional or bodily through the interface, and avoiding reductionism.

[1]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems , 2005, CHI.

[2]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[3]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  Really, really small: the palpability of the invisible , 2007, C&C '07.

[4]  Jack Katz How Emotions Work , 1999 .

[5]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Interactional empowerment , 2008, CHI.

[6]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[7]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Feather, Scent, and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy , 1996 .

[8]  Andreas Spanias,et al.  Interaction and reflection via 3D path shape qualities in a mediated constructive learning environment , 2007, Emme '07.

[9]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[10]  J. Dewey Art as Experience , 1934 .

[11]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[12]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Affect: from information to interaction , 2005, Critical Computing.

[14]  Annika Wærn,et al.  Prosopopeia: experiences from a pervasive Larp , 2006, ACE '06.

[15]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  From Interactions to Integrations , 1997, INTERACT.

[17]  Kirsten Boehner,et al.  Evaluating Affector: Co-Interpreting What “Works” , 2005 .

[18]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[19]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Technology as experience , 2004, INTR.

[20]  Lars Erik Holmquist Mobile 2.0 , 2007, INTR.

[21]  A. Damasio Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[22]  Catherine A. Lutz Emotion, Thought, and Estrangement: Emotion as a Cultural Category , 1986 .

[23]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design , 1989, CHI '90.

[24]  Leopoldina Fortunati,et al.  Mediating the Human Body: Technology, Communication, and Fashion , 2003 .

[25]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[26]  G. Fricchione Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[27]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Parsing the subcomponents of emotion and disorders of emotion: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. , 2003 .

[28]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  PingPongPlus: design of an athletic-tangible interface for computer-supported cooperative play , 1999, CHI '99.

[29]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Affective Loop Experiences - What Are They? , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[30]  Kristina Höök,et al.  On being supple: in search of rigor without rigidity in meeting new design and evaluation challenges for HCI practitioners , 2009, CHI.

[31]  E. Grosz Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism , 1994 .

[32]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  A tabletop learning environment for logistics assistants: activating teachers , 2008 .

[33]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Reflect: An Interactive Table for Regulating Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning , 2008, EC-TEL.

[34]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How emotion is made and measured , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Automated Posture Analysis for Detecting Learner's Interest Level , 2003, 2003 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[36]  Ben Matthews,et al.  Easy doesn’t do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[37]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Experiencing the Affective Diary , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[38]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[39]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[40]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Conceptualising tangibles to support learning , 2003, IDC '03.

[41]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Life on the edge: supporting collaboration in location-based experiences , 2005, CHI.

[42]  Jin Moen KinAesthetic Movement Interaction: Designing for the Pleasure of Motion , 2006 .

[43]  Catherine A. Lutz Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory , 1988 .

[44]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality , 2008, IHM '08.

[45]  Nasser Peyghambarian Thanks for the memory , 1995, Nature.

[46]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides , 2008, CHI.

[47]  Kristina Höök,et al.  In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Designing familiar open surfaces , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[49]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[50]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .