Synergistic application of geometric and radiometric features of LiDAR data for urban land cover mapping.

Urban land cover map is essential for urban planning, environmental studies and management. This paper aims to demonstrate the potential of geometric and radiometric features derived from LiDAR waveform and point cloud data in urban land cover mapping with both parametric and non-parametric classification algorithms. Small footprint LiDAR waveform data acquired by RIEGL LMS-Q560 in Zhangye city, China is used in this study. A LiDAR processing chain is applied to perform waveform decomposition, range determination and radiometric characterization. With the synergic utilization of geometric and radiometric features derived from LiDAR data, urban land cover classification is then conducted using the Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and random forest algorithms. The results suggest that the random forest classifier achieved the most accurate result with overall classification accuracy of 91.82% and the kappa coefficient of 0.88. The overall accuracies of MLC and SVM are 84.02, and 88.48, respectively. The study suggest that the synergic utilization of geometric and radiometric features derived from LiDAR data can be efficiently used for urban land cover mapping, the non-parametric random forest classifier is a promising approach for the various features with different physical meanings.

[1]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  C. Tucker,et al.  Evidence for a significant urbanization effect on climate in China. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Yifang Ban,et al.  Fusion of Quickbird MS and RADARSAT SAR data for urban land-cover mapping: object-based and knowledge-based approach , 2010 .

[4]  Martin Brown,et al.  Linear spectral mixture models and support vector machines for remote sensing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Zheng Niu,et al.  Range determination for generating point clouds from airborne small footprint LiDAR waveforms. , 2012, Optics express.

[6]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[7]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[8]  Ana Paula Kersting,et al.  Improving classification accuracy of airborne LiDAR intensity data by geometric calibration and radiometric correction , 2012 .

[9]  J. A. Tullis,et al.  Synergistic Use of Lidar and Color Aerial Photography for Mapping Urban Parcel Imperviousness , 2003 .

[10]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[11]  Eléonore Wolff,et al.  Urban land cover multi‐level region‐based classification of VHR data by selecting relevant features , 2006 .

[12]  L.L.F. Janssen,et al.  Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land - cover data : a review , 1994 .

[13]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[14]  Junichi Imanishi,et al.  Object-based classification of land cover and tree species by integrating airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution imagery data , 2011, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[15]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Radiometric Calibration of LIDAR Intensity With Commercially Available Reference Targets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Mikhail F. Kanevski,et al.  A Survey of Active Learning Algorithms for Supervised Remote Sensing Image Classification , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[17]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data , 2012 .

[18]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[19]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  M. Ridd Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .

[21]  Austin Troy,et al.  Object-based land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: A comparison study , 2009 .

[22]  Wai Yeung Yan,et al.  Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review , 2015 .

[23]  Martin Herold,et al.  Some challenges in global land cover mapping : An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets , 2008 .

[24]  Guobin Zhu,et al.  Classification using ASTER data and SVM algorithms;: The case study of Beer Sheva, Israel , 2002 .

[25]  R. Tateishi,et al.  Evaluating urban expansion and land use change in Shijiazhuang, China, by using GIS and remote sensing , 2006 .

[26]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Range determination with waveform recording laser systems using a Wiener Filter , 2006 .

[27]  Ali Madanipour,et al.  Roles and Challenges of Urban Design , 2006 .

[28]  Ahmed Shaker,et al.  Radiometric Correction and Normalization of Airborne LiDAR Intensity Data for Improving Land-Cover Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[30]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification , 1980 .

[31]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  Relevance assessment of full-waveform lidar data for urban area classification , 2011 .

[32]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[33]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[34]  T. Webster,et al.  Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces , 2006 .

[35]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.