Measuring PM2.5, Ultrafine Particles, Nicotine Air and Wipe Samples Following the Use of Electronic Cigarettes

Background Few studies have examined the extent of inhalation or dermal contact among bystanders following short-term, secondhand e-cigarette exposure. Objective Measure PM2.5 (particles < 2.5 microns), UF (ultrafine particles < 100 nm), and nicotine in air and deposited on surfaces and clothing pre-/during/post- a short-term (2-hour) e-cigarette exposure. Methods E-cigarettes were used ad libitum by three experienced users for 2 hours during two separate sessions (disposable e-cigarettes, then tank-style e-cigarettes, or "tanks") in a 1858 ft3 room. We recorded: uncorrected PM2.5 (using SidePak); UF (using P-Trak); air nicotine concentrations (using air samplers; SKC XAD-4 canisters); ambient air exchange rate (using an air capture hood). Wipe samples were taken by wiping 100 cm2 room surfaces pre- and post- both sessions, and clean cloth wipes were worn during the exposure and collected at the end. Results Uncorrected PM2.5 and UF were higher (p < .0001) during sessions than before or after. Median PM2.5 during exposure was higher using tanks (0.515 mg/m3) than disposables (0.035 mg/m3) (p < .0001). Median UF during exposure was higher using disposables (31 200 particles/cm3) than tanks (25 200 particles/cm3)(p < .0001). Median air nicotine levels were higher (p < .05) during both sessions (disposables = 0.697 ng/L, tanks = 1.833 ng/L) than before (disposables = 0.004 ng/L, tanks = 0.010 ng/L) or after (disposables = 0.115 ng/L, tanks = 0.147 ng/L). Median accumulation rates of nicotine on surface samples were 2.1 ng/100 cm2/h using disposables and 4.0 ng/100 cm2/h using tanks; for cloth samples, it was 44.4 ng/100 cm2/h using disposables and 69.6 ng/100 cm2/h using tanks (p < .01). Mean room ventilation rate was ~5 air changes per hour during both sessions. Conclusions Short-term e-cigarette use can produce: elevated PM2.5; elevated UF; nicotine in the air; and accumulation of nicotine on surfaces and clothing. Implications Short-term indoor e-cigarette use produced accumulation of nicotine on surfaces and clothing, which could lead to dermal exposure to nicotine. Short-term e-cigarette use produced elevated PM2.5 and ultrafine particles, which could lead to secondhand inhalation of these particles and any chemicals associated with them by bystanders. We measured significant differences in PM2.5 and ultrafine particles between disposable e-cigarettes and tank-style e-cigarettes, suggesting a difference in the exposure profiles of e-cigarette products.

[1]  G. Matt,et al.  Thirdhand smoke and exposure in California hotels: non-smoking rooms fail to protect non-smoking hotel guests from tobacco smoke exposure , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[2]  Prue Talbot,et al.  Metal and Silicate Particles Including Nanoparticles Are Present in Electronic Cigarette Cartomizer Fluid and Aerosol , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  G. Matt,et al.  Households contaminated by environmental tobacco smoke: sources of infant exposures , 2004, Tobacco Control.

[4]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[5]  Van T. Tong,et al.  Perceptions of emerging tobacco products and nicotine replacement therapy among pregnant women and women planning a pregnancy , 2016, Preventive medicine reports.

[6]  Jason S. Herrington,et al.  Electronic cigarette solutions and resultant aerosol profiles. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  E. Soule,et al.  Electronic cigarette use and indoor air quality in a natural setting , 2016, Tobacco Control.

[8]  T. Pechacek,et al.  Nicotine and the Developing Human: A Neglected Element in the Electronic Cigarette Debate. , 2015, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  R. Arrazola,et al.  Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2013 , 2014, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[10]  R. Jörres,et al.  Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette consumers. , 2014, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[11]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. , 2009, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[12]  D. Hammond,et al.  E-Cigarette Market Trends in Traditional U.S. Retail Channels, 2012-2013. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[13]  M Lippmann,et al.  Deposition, retention, and clearance of inhaled particles. , 1980, British journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[15]  T. Salthammer,et al.  Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? , 2013, Indoor air.

[16]  M. Goniewicz,et al.  A pilot study on nicotine residues in houses of electronic cigarette users, tobacco smokers, and non-users of nicotine-containing products. , 2015, The International journal on drug policy.

[17]  B. Apelberg,et al.  Calls to Poison Centers for Exposures to Electronic Cigarettes — United States, September 2010–February 2014 , 2014, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[18]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[19]  Brian A. King,et al.  Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[20]  P K Hopke,et al.  Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality , 2012, Inhalation toxicology.